
As all logical cognitive deduction are lost on the primordial liberal mind the idea there are no such phenomena as societies wholly egalitarian is tantamount to blasphemy given they portend the rape ethos to ensure there will be. The matter as human beings we are unique in our individual qualities will alone preclude such a possibility except for when millions are killed through genocide since the lone natural equity possible will always be death. In liberally referring to the left-wing ideologue John Stuart Mill the world exemplifies applied correctly the utilitarian idealism where each man and woman are expected to contribute to the greater good based upon the talents each individual may offer. Such a concept implies maximizing potential by assuming the individual is faceless contributes to the composition of a mass collective where all equally contribute. But this is never true.
By the very nature of mankind the intelligence of two individuals is mutually exclusive and in a sense are truly separate but equal as natures segregation. Some are intellectually-gifted while others are disabled but in reality the gap is in the central portions of the intelligence quotient (IQ) bell curve the standard deviation psychologists declare spans what is considered measured intelligence. Here is where the standards are met; to the top of the curve may one find those of abnormal cerebral qualities applying the Malthusian principle through the amoral eradication of those all too often considered dysgenic and unfit to live. They are the ideological giants what some reference as the Platonic philosopher kings. Unfortunately too they often are the evil geniuses of Cartesian philosophy corrupt in their roles of applying their intellects into the most dangerous form of power for which they obtain. Because they are brilliant as ideological giants they are also among the most innately corrupt through their megalomania and insatiable bigotry. These are the very definitions behind why the elitist intelligentsia must be held accountable under a checks and balances system in hearkening Lord Actons very correct assertion absolute power corrupts absolute. It is a machination of the amoral secularist principle the temporal absolutist rejection of Judeo-Christian divinity.
In reading a very profound E-mail by an atheist named John admitting what is true should each atheist just admit so J. Warner Wallace himself formerly an atheist and now a minister posted the following letter on his website. Atheism indeed has become a religion through applied metaphor through politics even with its own established church:
To all my Atheist friends.
Let us stop sugar coating it. I know its hard to come out and be blunt with the friendly Theists who frequent sites like this. However in your efforts to play nice" and be civil" you actually do them a great disservice.
We are Atheists. We believe that the Universe is a great uncaused random accident. All life in the Universe past and future are the results of random chance acting on itself. While we acknowledge concepts like morality politeness civility seem to exist we know they do not. Our highly evolved brains imagine that these things have a cause or a use and they have in the past theyve allowed life to continue on this planet for a short blip of time. But make no mistake: all our dreams loves opinions and desires are figments of our primordial imagination. They are fleeting electrical signals that fire across our synapses for a moment in time. They served some purpose in the past. They got us here. Thats it. All human achievement and plans for the future are the result of some ancient evolved brain and accompanying chemical reactions that once served a survival purpose. Ex: Ill marry and nurture children because my genes demand reproduction Ill create because creativity served a survival advantage to my ancient ape ancestors Ill build cities and laws because this allowed my ape grandfather time and peace to reproduce and protect his genes. My only directive is to obey my genes. Eat sleep reproduce die. That is our bible.
We deride the Theists for having created myths and holy books. We imagine ourselves superior. But we too imagine there are reasons to obey laws be polite protect the weak etc. Rubbish. We are nurturing a new religion one where we imagine that such conventions have any basis in reality. Have they allowed life to exist? Absolutely. But who cares? Outside of my greedy little genes need to reproduce there is nothing in my world that stops me from killing you and reproducing with your wife. Only the fear that I might be incarcerated and thus be deprived of the opportunity to do the same with the next guys wife stops me. Some of my Atheist friends have fooled themselves into acting like the general population. They live in suburban homes drive Toyota Camrys attend school plays. But underneath they know the truth. They are a bag of DNA whose only purpose is to make more of themselves. So be nice if you want. Be involved have polite conversations be a model citizen. Just be aware that while technically an Atheist you are an inferior one. Youre just a little bit less evolved thats all. When you are ready to join me let me know Ill be reproducing with your wife.
I know its not PC to speak so bluntly about the ramifications of our beliefs but in our discussions with Theists we sometimes tiptoe around what we really know to be factual. Maybe its time we Atheists were a little more truthful and let the chips fall where they may. At least thats what my genes are telling me to say.
In admitting the atheist religion as an amoral void in principle fallacious scientism is subject always to change its absolutism through abrogation of their standards sullying the rights of those who choose moral grounds even as mankind learns from its mistakes expanding upon its laurels declarative of its humanist perfection. It should be noted randomized causation is in fact an abrogation of the truth; atheists will always push atop the hill that boulder determining the most finite of creationist substances only for it to inevitably roll down while Christianity remains confident it is what it is" with no need to ever say sorry for diffusing Jesus unconditional love.
I care not what people choose to do between the sheets in their bedrooms; this is none of my business to each his own. On the contrary I will never approve of any behavior based on statist coercion or assured ostracism. It is disgusting to visualize intercourse between two or more men through anal penetration or fellatio unnatural acts fruitless in all other traits. The matter homosexuality cannot naturally lead to the propagation of the human race infers there is nothing natural about such a practice; ergo by its very biological preclusivity homesexuality cannot be a natural right. To be gay is a right bequeathed not by God but by temporal authority of the secular state. Temporal amorality has led to declining birth rates through sanctioned population control by way of racist eugenics engaging in genocide and warfare to the tune of billions over the past century alone. The family unit in America initiated its precipitous decline with the rise of the American Atheist movement in the 1960s. Couple this alongside the child-family tax credit discouraging women from marrying the problem becomes ever clearer so somber the reality.
I also have no quarrel with state-sanctioned same-sex civil unions. Years ago though I warned people once civil unions are universal the domino effect encroaching upon the right to the free practice of religion would come under attack. Same-sex couples who more often than not denounce the sanctity of God find it in their political interest to whore their own prejudice to the highest bidders. They demand any church arbitrarily chosen to perform these rites not prescribed by the Abrahamic traditions of the Bible but by the amoral state in which secularism has manifested into its own visceral god complex. Same-sex marriage was never intended in the Bible because it is a union meant to bind men and women in holy matrimony to initiate the process of raising families through natural conception of their offspring and many generations of progeny. A man is not a natural mother; a woman cannot find an equitable biological claim to be a father. Thus the largely-secular LGBT community is not interested in recognition under Gods auspices to apply love as their justification to demand a Christian-based marriage. Like all reflections of the liberal mindset who today espouse a far more insidious form of National Socialism they support and openly employ rape in coercing those against whom they despise to either forgo their core principles convictions and beliefs based upon their traditional values under God or be imprisoned not as conscientious dissenters but as radicals who engage in militant disobedience in citing the Bible daring to exercise their right to choice under God. The LGBT fringe only understands beyond their bathhouse orgies the natural right to choice is arbitrary only among their amoral machinations in justifying they are greater than any god and therefore are willing to rape the actual Bible in both its spirit and the abrogation of a sacred text it wishes due to its hatred. This means supporting homosexual trends towards pedophilia and sex slavery of young boys in all facets. No wonder such people are Islamophiles; as Muslims rape goats and engaging in submission and domination with whips and chains..
I actually favor a third approach one which the LGBT Nazis will never support given their goal is to destroy Christianity not to obtain any ethereal equality which under God all are created equal because each sin is viewed the same: abominations condemned to death should one choose not to accept Jesus as their Savior. I support the total abolition of legal marriage for the purpose of deferring this sacred rite to the diverse array of religions who are as balkanized on the issue as is the general public. There are numerous faiths which will happily issue these rites to gay couples yet the right to choose a relationship with Jesus Christ specifically is the target all left-wing political ideologues advocate as their greatest threat to their survival since Protestant Christians are centrally-geared towards a more direct interpretation of the Gospels and therefore refuse to acknowledge the temporal sovereignty of any government over God. The matter even conservative pundits refuse to support the total abolition of statutory marriage is reflective of one damnable fundamental truth: that the idea of repealing the marriage penalty as a form of direct taxation is unappealing. Statists demand pecuniary compensation for all endeavors of the general public are willing to engage in extreme measures to confiscate the peoples earned incomes. Therefore even for conservatives political expediency with respect to the roles of religion and state applies in the separation of the intended rhetoric and equity of its purpose through the confiscation of ones right to his or her own independence through property ownership. God forbid the pedophiles among the LGBT lunatic fringe not have the right to rape our children ragged and raw.
After all what the state will provide it can take away based on the political expediency of the moment. Do not be so quick to assume if being part of the LGBT fringe equates to ones rights being universally protected. Conservatives will protect their right to exist; the left-wing fringes will not given this new voluntary" program in New York. The laws of nature and natures God are not arbitrary to the laws in accordance to the state. You cannot move Jerusalem to Washington D.C. and if you were to submit to such a standard you would not like it.