The New Poll Tax: Ballot Access Laws Foil Independent Candidates

by Peter B. Gemma

There is no free market of ideas candidates or political parties on Election Day.

Its not for a lack of demand. According to the latest ABC News/Washington Post survey 57 percent of Americans are dissatisfied with the choice between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton; 44 percent say they would prefer a third-party candidate to run. A recent Associated Press/University of Chicago poll revealed that 71 percent of millennials want an alternative to the Republican and Democrat nominees. In another survey Public Policy Polling matched a giant meteor hitting the earth against Clinton and Trump. The killer asteroid nabbed 13 percent of the vote far more than any third party now ballot qualified. The establishment parties benefit from strict ballot access laws that make it difficult for alternative candidates to participate in elections. In order to get on the ballot independent and third party candidates must meet a variety of byzantine state-specific filing requirements. Complex stipulations and regulations determine whether voters will be able to choose from a larger pool of parties and candidates. Unorthodox candidates must undergo bureaucratic and burdensome trials in all 50 states before they are permitted to run for office. And the laws have proven effective: no independent or third party presidential candidate has won an electoral vote in 48 years. To get on the ballot nationwide this year it is estimated that a maverick presidential candidate must have more than 880000 signatures on petitions. The major parties regularly challenge the legitimacy of ballot access petitions (leaving out a middle initial is among many reasons that a name can be considered invalid) so securing a ratio of two-to-one of the required number of signatures is the pragmatic strategy for campaigns. That means an army of petitioners going door-to-door should collect about 1.76 million names in 2016. If that becomes difficult to manage a candidate may hire professional solicitors who charge $2.50-$5.00 per signature. You do the math. Nine states dont even allow voters to write-in names of their preferred candidates. The Libertarian Party beat Oklahomas tightly controlled process by obtaining more than 42000 signatures. The petition campaign cost the national party $104000. For third parties organizational infrastructure as well as deep pockets is vital -- running for President means conducting 50 races simultaneously. Start-up campaigns simply do not have the money or the manpower to be competitive with Democrats and Republicans because of the barriers the ruling parties have put in place. The nations leading expert on ballot access laws is Richard Winger editor of Ballot Access News. He maintains that Ballot access restrictions vary from state to state but they have one thing in common and that is to prevent people other than Democrats and Republicans from getting on the ballot. Disenfranchising candidates is part of the election game as well. Forty-five states have enacted sore loser laws denying defeated candidates the right to run a third party or independent campaign. If a candidate believes political power brokers have quashed any chance to win the Democrat or Republican nomination there is no second chance. Third party candidate Ralph Nader has observed If we all have an equal right to run for election. If they call third-party candidates spoilers but they dont call their major opponent in the other party a spoiler they are assigning a second-class citizenship to the third-party candidacy. The Gallup organization has found that A majority of Americans 60 percent say a third major political party is needed because the Republican and Democratic parties do such a poor job of representing the American people. Yet when voters get inside the polling booth they often find only two candidates listed. Richard Winger asserts The extreme disparity of the burdens placed on old established parties versus new parties has no parallel in any other democratic nation in the world. Reasonable ballot access requirements to set qualifying standards are necessary. However just as poll taxes were set up to keep certain citizens from expressing their right to vote todays ballot access laws are deliberately designed to provide a similar obstacle for freethinkers who challenge the political power elites. In 1775 John Adams warned future generations of American voters that There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties each arranged under its leader and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This in my humble apprehension is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution. He was so right.