Everyday I seem to read of horrific stories of young women and little girls brutally raped and slaughtered by illegal immigrants and how others over time are found Not Guilty" or their case is expunged from the legal record for matters of political expediency. It has grown into a double standard to where Barack Obama whose past is littered with dead bodies has something to hide from his formative years in Kenya. He will always be provided a free pass his detractors (Hillary Clinton who launched the birther" movement) declared racists" because somehow his Sub Saharan African heritage is actually being acknowledged as it is but not Ted Cruz. Sen. Cruz whose birth certificate and personal information are very public made it clear he was born to parents who were naturalized American citizens in Canada. And because Sen. Cruz does not support Obamas overtures to Communist Cuba as he likely will spread more of love North Korea he is not truly Hispanic". Poverty seems to be a common theme for the Left. The more people it leads to morbid poverty and therefore the longest possible bread and soup lines in major cities the more success it can measure for itself.
I have read extensively historical records and cultural landmarks in literature on what makes America so special and I still do everyday. I am continually amazed by the sheer ignorance of liberals and libertarians both of which are politically-born of the same cloth in most ways. Both liberals and libertarians believe in a non-morally binding approach to civil government as in a nation where hedonism is not merely to be considered the norm but a matter to emancipate the general public from any faith-based or otherwise-culturally ingrained indoctrination these moral codes once upon a time legally deferred to parental consent and individual community charters. In fact U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan has admitted his design to strip the right of parents to raise their own children and furthermore for those without" parents to live in boarding schools all while parents protesting against Common Core are subject to arrest. To listen to him is to recollect tales of the horrifying Hitler Youth and Red Guard programs of Nazi Germany and the Peoples Republic of China under Mao Zedong. The individual is meant to be faceless under Obama. Todays children will be those blank-checked dependent empty countenances with much ado about nothing tomorrow.
youtubehttps://youtu.be/-N9U4256QYU/youtube
Both liberals and libertarians espouse historical revisionism to rewrite what cannot fit securely into their narratives to correct what was wrong with past agendas rather than addressing the actual roots of their troubles. With respect to liberals they simply choose to scrap the most critical academic field from all public educational curricula. It was Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-79) the accredited intellectual founder of left-wing political thought who made this the operative political attitude among future generations of this fringe at all extremities in his landmark political treatises. Historical revisionism is foreshadowed by Rousseau to perhaps entail such extreme measures as complex thought processes involving notions of property calculations about the future immediate recognition of all other humans as potential threats and possibly even minimal language skills".
I am not abusing science…I am defending virtue before virtuous men." (First Discourse Vol. I p. 4)
Astronomy was born from superstition; eloquence from ambition hate flattery and falsehood; geometry from avarice physics from vain curiosity; all even moral philosophy from human pride." (First Discourse Vol. I p. 12)
All ran to meet their chains thinking they secured their freedom for although they had enough reason to feel the advantages of political establishment they did not have enough experience to foresee its dangers." (Second Discourse Vol. II p. 54)
For the paramount intellectual giant of the libertarian movement Murray Rothbard historical revisionism paints a subjective portrait of a canvas already inscribed only with defamation or roses whichever is most practical. He wrote this in his article Revisionism for Our Time" (1966).
Revisionism as applied to World War II and its origins (as also for previous wars) has the general function of bringing historical truth to an American and a world public that had been drugged by wartime lies and propaganda. This in itself is a virtue. But some truths of history of course may be largely of antiquarian interest with little relevance to present-day concerns… All these lessons revisionism has to teach us. For revisionism in the final analysis is based on truth and rationality. Truth and rationality are always the first victims in any war frenzy; and they are therefore once again an extremely rare commodity on todays market. Revisionism brings to the artificial frenzy of daily events and day-to-day propaganda the cool but in the last analysis glorious light of historical truth. Such truth is almost desperately needed in todays world."
Once one concedes that a single world government is not necessary then where does one logically stop at the permissibility of separate states? If Canada and the United States can be separate nations without being denounced as in a state of impermissible anarchy why may not the South secede from the United States? New York State from the Union? New York City from the state? Why may not Manhattan secede? Each neighborhood? Each block? Each house? Each person?"A nation therefore has no right to say to a province: You belong to me I want to take you. A province consists of its inhabitants. If anybody has a right to be heard in this case it is these inhabitants. Boundary disputes should be settled by plebiscite."
The ambiguity portends itself. Does Rothbard mean for such a devolution to entail democracy or anarchy? That depends on when you read a piece and from which part of his life and career he authored it. Rothbard admitted to becoming an anarchist. He also devalued the right of the individual to his or her own self-accountability that the fetus is a parasite". From one vantage point Rothbard would love the Outback Steakhouse slogan No rules. Just right." The freest one can possibly be is dead since no one has the right to be born once conceived.
Since President Obama is a master of all these illicit political tactics he also had no shame declaring the lie Native Americans alone have the right to object to illegal immigration. Conveniently there was no such thing as the political state in North America either 15000 years when the original humans in the Western Hemisphere crossed the glacial bridge from Siberia to Alaska near the Bering Strait (known to geologists as Beringia") nor when John Smith and John Rolfe established the first permanent settlement at Jamestown Virginia in 1607. In fact the Native Americans at the conclusion of the last major ice age not only invaded" North America but raped her of her land through settlements depopulating entire ecosystems of their wildlife for food and game. There were the noble savages the nomads who today would really be in trouble with the EPA and animal rights activists for being people who eat tasty animals.
youtubehttps://youtu.be/aiXuEk_CyWs/youtube
Since there is no consensus as to what is considered a Native American" as man is not indigenous to the Americas might I ask Mr. Obama why it is he refuses to consider himself an illegal immigrants descendent given the original humanoid figures are believed to be born in Abyssinia in Africa near present-day Ethiopia? I did not have a most distant ancestor in the Americas at that time to file a grievance against the invasion of the first peoples in the Western Hemisphere who were descendants of Africans. Yet today I am being accosted as a white man guilty of white privilege" because well I was somehow born of the good genes in which according to the Left inadvertently admitting their belief black people are racially-dysgenic through inferior genetics. How horrible such a racist as I must be for opposing our current president would dare point that out regarding the left-wing race baiters who apply socialism to kill what Margaret Sanger called the unfit.