State Bar of Arizona Disciplinary Panel Dismisses Complaint Against Kari Lake’s Two Attorneys over Voting Machine Tabulator Lawsuit

A disciplinary panel for the State Bar of Arizona (SBA) dismissed complaints filed against two of Kari Lake’s attorneys that were brought over their work representing Kari Lake in a 2022 lawsuit, Lake v. Hobbs, challenging the use of voting machine tabulators in elections. The panel of three, led by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Margaret Downie (pictured above), found that the SBA did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that Kurt Olsen — who represented himself and isn’t a licensed member of the SBA — and Andrew Parker violated any ethics rules. The decision cited a recent opinion from the Arizona Supreme Court, Ariz. Republican Party v. Richer, which held that attorneys should not be sanctioned for bringing election lawsuits.

U.S. District Court Judge John Tuchi, who was appointed to the bench by former President Barack Obama, ordered sanctions of $122,200 against Olsen, Parker, and attorney Alan Dershowitz over a year ago for bringing the lawsuit. The sanctions were requested by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, who were represented by Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell. The Maricopa County Republican Committee censured Mitchell over the representation.

Judges have not sanctioned attorneys in similar cases to the lawsuit brought by Lake and Finchem challenging voting machine tabulators.

The panel noted that the sanctions are currently being appealed and said, “The hearing panel does not rely on the District Court’s sanctions decision in reaching its conclusions.”

Read the rest of the article at The Arizona Sun Times
Subscribe to email updates from the Arizona Sun Times

Kurt Olsen by is licensed under