Same-Sex Marriage Is Illegal Communist Agenda Unconstitutionally Destroying Equality Between Men and Women

The Dobbs decision marked the beginning of the Supreme Court de-federalizing issues constitutionally reserved for the States. Justice Clarence Thomas realized that the federal Same-Sex marriage created in Obergefell v. Hodges must also be revisited. 

The pattern of centralized command-and-control by courts and radical state legislatures is the result of corrupt Marxist-feminist lawyers who gradually seized control of the ABA, State Bars, and the American Psychological Association since 1964 (I have 35 years of experience and documented evidence battling them to back this statement up).   

Marxist-Communist feminists now control the Executive and Administrative branches as well as Congress. This is why everything Biden and the Administrative branches does under false narratives executes the Communist agenda by legal fiat.

One major feminist goal has always been for Marxist elites to run the nation as a welfare plantation, to destroy heterosexual marriage, and religions.  Same-Sex Marriage (SSM) accomplishes those goals and became a primary goal since the late 1970’s.

Less than one month after the Dobbs decision (a new world’s record), the House passed the Respect for Marriage Act (H.R. 8404) in an attempt to head off the inevitable demise of Obergefell.  If this bill is passed, it will be declared unconstitutional along with Obergefell.

Here is why.  We begin with a paragraph of state-level legislation I created with assistance of a brilliant legal scholar stating why heterosexual marriage is the only constitutional form of marriage:
 
The Supreme Court will eventually have to rule on this incontrovertible truth.  Equitable issues before the court are always paramount.  Obergefell and decisions leading up to it were invalid because those defending heterosexual marriage were not aware of the equal rights issues and lost most prior cases.  Coming litigation, which we are preparing now, should invalidate Obergefell, may restore the Defense of Marriage Act enacted by Congress in July, 1996 with bipartisan support, invalidate H.R. 8404 (if enacted), and could even restore California’s Proposition 8 law.

Facts to be presented to the Supreme Court include:

SSM forms a Supremacist form of marriage with special legal, economic, political, and social rights denied to other forms of marriage solely on the basis of sex.
 

1. SSM involving two women (regardless of sexual preference) automatically forms a  three-way statutory contract between two women and government due to existing Title IV-D and other entitlements guaranteed to unmarried or divorced women.  Government is the automatic third party collecting “child support” entitlements for children born in these marriages.  Most mother-mother marriages will have children by men outside their marriages. 
2. Female-female SSM is an attempt to hide illegitimacy within an artificial construct of marriage.  These SSMs double-up on child support and benefits, automatically importing the welfare state into nearly all female-female SSMs.  Via legal jiggering, the institution of marriage is converted into an invisible government welfare-state program, making todays gigantic illegitimacy headache appear smaller.
3. Female-female marriages have astonishing economic advantages.  Women keep their two incomes and additionally rake in large child support and other welfare state incomes not available to heterosexual marriages or male-male marriages.
4. Female-female marriages are essentially a government-sponsored form of reproductive polyandry.
5. SSM marriages are commonly made between both heterosexual and lesbian/bisexual women.  The economic and legal advantages are large enough to convince any women, regardless of sexual preference, to “choose” SSM on the basis of significant government benefits guaranteed solely on the basis of sex.

Statutory discrimination against men solely on the basis of sex within the construct of SSM
 

1. SSM discriminates against all men regardless of gender identity solely on the basis of sexual ability to bear children. Men must rent wombs at tremendous expense or adopt to have children – neither of which are natural and fail balancing tests. Federal law precludes men from seeking custody or parental rights.  Nearly every SSM involving two women of childbearing age will result in systemic discrimination against one or more men.
2. Men conscripted into the system of planned reproductive fraud get nothing but a child support order and a trip to prison if they cannot afford to pay the child support.
3. Female-Female marriages have automatic custody of children they bear by men outside the marriage, often by reproductive entrapment.  Lying about use of birth control is not a crime.  It is an excellent way to make a living fully supported in state and federal law.
4. SSM violates 14th Amendment protection against sex discrimination. The 5th Amendment is violated where men are administratively deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, and their private property taken for public use financing the welfare state without just compensation. 
5. Female-female SSM is an unconstitutional form of slavery subjugating men, forcing them to labor for the benefit of women to settle an arbitrary debt, and for which nothing is received in return.  Pursuant to The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 and subsequent revisions:

• Child support orders are administratively created with no due process rights for men.
• Child support orders are not based on actual income, but are based on assumptions of what a man could or should earn. 
• Child support orders are not modifiable for disability or other income-changing events. A study of 2000 California cases by the American Coalition for Fathers and Children found that 95% of fathers who lost employment in the dot.com and other economic collapses were unable to get a modification. Child support orders are not retroactively modifiable, nor can any past-due amount be forgiven or modified.
• Automatic penalties for getting behind in child support with any amount more the six months overdue include automatic revocation of driver’s license, passport, professional and business licenses, and “border law” provisions criminalizing interstate travel.  Welfare debt cannot be reduced even in bankruptcy. 
• Men whose incomes are disrupted by economic downturns, disability, or other external events are unconstitutionally placed in a statutory debtors prison permanently unable to satisfy child support and other systemically-imposed debt.

Economic discrimination solely on the basis of sex.
 

1. Heterosexual marriages are economically inferior to SSM marriages because they only have two incomes and no special entitlements guaranteed to female-female SSMs.
2. Natural marriages require little or no welfare, are the backbone of income tax payments, have low bankruptcy and illegitimacy rates, have the highest success rates raising children into productive adulthood, and are much more likely to enough funds saved for retirement.

Socioeconomic Harms caused by SSM
 

1. SSM is creating an anti-social generation of men who do not marry.  Two-thirds of SSMs in Massachusetts are between women because men have no compelling reason to marry each other.  This is self-evident in today’s generation of disconnected young men indoctrinated into Marxist rainbow and drug culture in schools spending formative years addicted to violent video games, pornography, and drugs which are common drivers of school violence.
2. Hundreds of peer-reviewed studies about the welfare state prove that when men and women do not marry, men and women become desocialized.  Significant increases in all forms of violence, drug abuse, child abuse and child sexual abuse are some of the consequences.
3. Every SSM involving illegitimate children born of female-female marriages expands the size of the welfare state, the myriad of consequential socioeconomic problems, and taxpayer-funded federal and state demand expenditures. These costs are significant. My White paper “The History of Conservative Social Policy Failures Between 1959-2022” documents some of the costs driving never-ending federal deficit spending. Phyllis Schlafly’s article “What Destroying Marriage Costs Us”, citing my research, discusses the 69 means-tested taxpayer-funded entitlement programs that existed in 2011. 

SSM is foreign Marxist/communist agenda intended to destroy marriage, church, family, and economy in all countries including the United States, and is so entrenched as to be considered normal thinking.

Karl Marx advocated for abolition of history, private property, the family, eternal truths, nations and borders, and religion to replace them with a Communist State based renditions of the word “equity”.

In the Communist Manifesto, the abolition of marriage and family was central to his goal to replace “bourgeois” marriage with a form of marriage that “moves beyond marriage”.  He predicted that “the bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course.”

In his book “Takedown” (censored by many websites), Paul Kengor Chronicled the progression of the Marxist-Leninist redefinition of the family, He identified how radicals throughout the 20th century implemented Marx’s utopian world—one in which the State usurped the role of the family. From Margaret Sanger’s Birth Control League to Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse’s polyamorous relationships. Kengor helps us understand that the Supreme Court decision on marriage (Obergefell) is just one more step toward the elimination of marriage because if marriage can mean “anything” then marriage becomes meaningless.

Other Communist sexual revolution agenda, pushed and mostly fully adopted by the ABA, American Psychological Association, academia, and government in the United States include Sigmund Freud’s fraudulent sexual pseudo-psychology, Alfred Kinsey (who by zoological extrapolation justified every possible form of sexual behavior including child rape as a false science, with assistance from Masters and Johnson (who I personally knew).  Harvey Milk’s Mattachine Society covertly organized victim-homosexual rights as cover for organized child sexual abuse,  Same-sex marriage was pushed over the top by a battalion of highly-organized Communist organizations financed by George Soros and hundreds of foreign communist corporations and backers.

The word “gender” is the key imaginary construct of the Communist sexual revolution, which over time has managed to fool everyone, including the Supreme Court into destroying natural equal rights on the basis of sex in favor of forcing SSM, forced transgender sexual mutilation of children, Roe v. Wade, suing bakeries and churches out of business, forcing so-called “Gay-Straight” grooming groups into high schools, costly lawsuits over pronouns changeable on a moment’s notice, discrimination laws giving the upper hand to the sexual revolution, and the common misuse of administrative false rape allegations on college campuses used to shut down fraternal organizations, sue sports figures, and expel any man campus feminists do not like.

How severely have Courts and politicians been fooled into acting as agents of the communist gender war? 

How Gender and Sex were bifurcated in the courts over time is of tremendous legal significance.  

In her first Supreme Court case Moritz v. Commissioner (1971), attorney Ruth Bader Ginsburg used the terms “sex” and “gender” as interchangeable legal equivalents in her arguments, which the court recognized as such. Immediately upon her appointment to the Supreme Court in 1993, she aggressively redefined the word “gender” in her decisions to be the legal fiction it is today.  Justice Kagan later joined the "gender-equity" war deprecating sex to be seen as immaterial, steering many Supreme Court decisions into serving communist purposes.

Just prior to the hearing in Obergefell v. Hodges, Justice Ginsburg officiated two SSMs in states where SSM was legal at the time.  While this was legal to do, Ginsberg tipped her hand, publicly indicating how she would rule in Obergefell without hearing the case on the merits.  Judge Roberts had a duty to disqualify her from hearing Obergefell despite calls for disqualification by ethical attorneys, but failed to do so apparently for reasons of political correctness.  Had Justice Roberts done his duty as Chief Justice, Obergefell would have been rejected in a 5-4 loss. 

The proof is in the fact that Justice Ketangi Brown Jackson, who refused to define a “woman”, was approved by the Senate, pushed over the top by the echo-chamber of political correctness.  Brown will be pursuing the communist “beyond marriage” agenda, which allows marriage to mean nothing more than the latest rainbow legal ploy. Her rulings will be based on gender, not on sex.  This facilitates erasure and systemic discrimination of normal women before the law, with the sexual revolution running the nation.

The long list of Transgender sexual revolutionaries serving on the President’s Cabinet, as heads of Administrative agencies, and in positions of control in the military, is incontrovertible proof nobody can explain-away.

Legislators should avoid all communist-inspired legislation like the plague

Legislators who cater to Communist legislation are a threat to the United States.  This threat includes both economic and social legislation (all social policy is economic policy that generally has large negative economic costs and consequences when it executes Communist agenda).  Mainstream and conservative legislators would be wise to avoid them and their legislation like the plague.  Legislators should be unafraid to talk about this publicly. 

Communism is, in fact, an undeniable tremendous across-the-board threat to the United States.

President Trump was prescient on this threat, calling out the Truth in his Council on Economic Advisors 2018 report “The Opportunity Costs of Socialism”, which identified communism as a seminal threat to the nation.  President Trump predicted the massive economic disasters caused by Biden administration communists the moment Biden took office.

Conservative media must strategically change the national conversation from complaining to winning the world war against organized communism.

Too many pundits, writers, talkers, and conservative foundations and think tanks fail to research subjects they pontificate about.   Too many outlets and media are run by people who graduated from progressive universities, whose brains are poisoned by political correctness and who never did research to find the Truth.   The narratives of the Right are just as wrong and dangerous as the narratives of the Left.

Irresponsible outlets never bring in a subject matter expert to relate the Truth.  Some irresponsible outlets whom I am battling today, actually suppress the Truth and censor it with the same gusto as the radical Left.  

One "conservative" radio station dominant in the St. Louis market is fully-compromised by shows and advertising funded by wealthy progressive-globalists.  They even feature advertising pushing marijuana sales by MissouriWild.com, urging everyone to smoke todays hybridized marijuana 3 to 10 times more powerful than the 1970s cornfield weed that turned Cheech and Chong into blithering idiots.  Their real agenda is to force Missouri House and Senate Leadership (mostly located in O'Fallon and St. Peters MO) to accept or push full-blown legalization of pot.  Their goal is published for all to see in Missouri Initiative Petition 2022-023.  Interdiction and prosecution of truckloads containing drug-cartel marijuana, and perhaps other drugs in mixed shipments, may be impossible absent a federal warrant.

At this time, the radio station I am referring to is effectively a progressive station (except for the Dan Bongino Show).  One of the hosts this week said "what is the purpose of talk radio if you limit the conversation to your own echo chamber?", which is exactly what he (and all other local show hosts) do every day censoring knowledgeable subject matter specialists and experts just like NPR does. 

The result: Beginning with the Reagan years, economic improvements Republicans stimulate are run into the red zone by tremendous increases in debt caused by runaway social spending and expansions of the welfare state, as documented in my White Paper, The History of Conservative Social Policy Failures Between 1959-2022.

Because of the 59-year-long conservative talk-radio echo chamber containing nothing but narratives and pontifications about principles, Republicans have always relied on the Left for social policy because Conservative foundations and policy makers never bothered to take the time to create sound supply-side social policy. Conservatives end up enacting Democrat-inspired programs funding sanitization of downstream disasters – which always ends up enabling more problems and failed government programs.  The above facts are documented in my White paper "The History of Conservative Social Policy Failures Between 1959-2022."

Conservative media outlets genuinely working to Make America Great Again must change their game, and will profit handsomely for doing so.  Politicians will never know what to do, or have the guts to do it, until an echo chamber of responsible conservative media outlets press them to enact inexpensive, deficit-shrinking, effective socioeconomic policies serving all the people.  This is not merely a reflection of President Trump's historically-successful "Make America Great" again policy,   It is a major expansion of MAGA, and the definition of "Ultra Maga",  RINO/globalist/NeverTrump Republicans pushing Great Reset/WEF/Bilderberg communist agenda need to get on board before they get roasted along with the Left.  About 80% of the public is fed up and will vote for President Trump in 2024.

Why the Supreme Court should apply the Communist Control Act of 1954 in relevant  future rulings and should review prior rulings made on the basis of Communist policy

The above agenda is, in fact, core political, legislative, and radical goals of the Communist Party USA and its tweed front end, the Democratic Party.

Pursuant to The Communist Control Act of 1954, It is illegal for the CPUSA and any organizations implementing the Communist agenda to exist in the United States. Congress wisely passed this law after witnessing creeping communist activity in the United States after World War I, and more actively after World War II.   This law has never been used for the purpose intended. President Eisenhower signed it into law with a powerful statement discussing its importance dealing with accelerating subversive Communist activity.

With Communists controlling the Executive, Administrative, much of the Legislative branch, the military, and many states, the Supreme Court must be prepared to procedurally rule against communist litigants.   I predict we will see many involving removal of communists running the Department of Justice, FBI, and other agencies for failure to prosecute.  Until this occurs, the DOJ and FBI will run amok, and justice can only be found in the Supreme Court.  SCOTUS should take all major cases if possible.

By applying the Communist Control Act of 1954, overturning Obergefell should be a simple procedural ruling rather than having to hear the evidence we have for a winning case. The same should happen to the Respect for Marriage Act.

Going forward, I suggest that in cases involving Communism, non-communist attorneys request a statutory ruling based on the Communist Control Act of 1954.  If SCOTUS begins hearings probing that issue first, the Court can clear nuisance cases quickly, will not need to hear the arguments, and should procedurally rule against Communist litigators.