Responsive image

Postmodernism and The Open Borders Debate

width=500 In America and Europe the practice of book burning is being repeated one written about extensively by science fiction author Ray Bradbury in Fahrenheit 451 (1953). It happened during the Middle Ages and it returned throughout most of the 20th Century. Public schools and universities have adopted revisionist curricula and censor what the authorities consider offensive about Americas past including the Founding Fathers and our own Constitution. But today it is not a theocracy or global dictatorship responsible nor is it being done through matches or bonfires. Rather it is the corporate media to which the Democrats have co-opted to fulfill the tasks that they legally cannot led by extremely wealthy powerful men and women in the media the popular culture even in the realm of financing and Wall Street many of whom you can see; others you have not nor ever will. One key platform within the Postmodern narrative is designed to deconstruct Western institutions along racial lines. The Arab Spring (2011-13) exploited the ancient Christian-Muslim rivalry in the Europe and Canada through mass immigration. This is designed to overload the welfare system and to use the narrative revised to right a wrong more than a century following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. In the United States decades of communist revolutions which transformed Latin America into a battlefront in the Cold War are being exploited through caravans and the Democratic Partys complicity in ethnic cleansing within the Middle East and south of our border.   The idea by the Globalist Left to promote foreign nationalism is to underpin an internal dialogue vexing anyone daring to oppose the ruling establishment. Ironically the Democrats ideal anti-Western society would reflect its favorite region of Europe Scandinavia closely connected to the Laws of Jante of which ten laws immediately apply.
  • Youre not to think you are anything special.
  • Youre not to think you are as good as we are.
  • Youre not to think you are smarter than we are.
  • Youre not to imagine yourself better than we are.
  • Youre not to think you know more than we do.
  • Youre not to think you are more important than we are.
  • Youre not to think you are good at anything.
  • Youre not to laugh at us.
  • Youre not to think anyone cares about you.
  • Youre not to think you can teach us anything.
These laws when read collectively dehumanize the individual (the evaporated self in Postmodern terminology) and are taught in public schools to children from a young age. Janters who transgress this unwritten law are regarded with both suspicion and hostility going against the broader agenda to preserve harmony social stability and uniformity at all costs. As a result an eleventh rule exists designed to strike fear into the hearts of anyone daring to stray the rest of society driven by internalized fear of ostracism and expulsion through peer pressure. It serves as the soft unspoken penal code of Jante which without any tangible forms of law enforcement such as police or the like within the broader context forges a psychological totalitarian effect which discourages human exceptionalism: Perhaps you dont think we know a few things about you?" caption id=attachment_30928 align=alignleft width=353Merkel The revelation of Facebooks Mark Zuckerbergs collaboration with German Chancellor Angela Merkel to censor any post arbitrarily tagged as hate speech from 2015. Over a year later Facebook would lead the charge to use the Russian collusion scandal as a pretext for eliminating what is considered fake news from its platform through adjustments in its algorithms. They primarily target conservative sources regardless of their association to Trump./caption In the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election the federal government began increasingly to focus on protecting the integrity of Americas elections from foreign interference (primarily China and Russia). Questions of how far should the media and Big Tech be taken to task and where social media promotes the interests of one political party by silencing the other in the name of political bias have emerged at the forefront of the debate. If only Americas collective memory wasnt so short that answer would be as simple as recalling that just five years ago Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was caught on a hot mic talking with German Chancellor Angela Merkel on the matter of censorship of users within the European Union protesting the migrant crisis as a violation of hate speech codes. If we think outside the box one can link the level of tax exemptions and bailouts following the 2008 global market crash to the massive increase of mergers and acquisitions by multinational corporations driving the engine of corruption along the path to a single world government. Today the interests of these organizations drive public policy far more fundamentally today than at anytime in recorded history. Instead of socialism under a German or Soviet totalitarian model it will come in the form that Margaret Thatcher warned: corporatism and climate change a key component to TPP and all future treaties within the United Nations which Mrs. Thatcher believed provides a marvelous excuse for worldwide supra-national socialism." 
caption id=attachment_32285 align=aligncenter width=650Globalism A key component to achieving a new world order under a single governing authority is the Internet by way of social media and the major media outlets internationally which have digitized the bulk of its news coverage./caption
Its all very complicated for a globalist to understand as Mrs. Thatcher explained at the Hoover Institute that the European Union can never be like the United States even under the neoliberal economic principles which she and Ronald Reagan supported only within the borders of nations.
Americans and Europeans alike sometimes forget how unique is the United States of America. No other nation has been created so swiftly and successfully. No other nation has been built upon an idea the idea of liberty. No other nation has so successfully combined people of different races and nations within a single culture. Both the founding fathers of the United States and successive waves of immigrants to your country were determined to create a new identity… And America herself has bound them to her with powerful bonds of patriotism and pride. The European nations are not and can never be like this. They are the product of history and not of philosophy. You can construct a nation on an idea; but you cannot reconstruct a nation on the basis of one."
So far we can say that Mrs. Thatcher was correct about the status of Americas foundation versus the history driving the existence of Europes ancient peoples cultures and nations ― in 1991 at least. But I reflect upon nearly 243 years of American history and then how the German philosopher Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel (1770-1831) the innovator of the Hegelian dialectic that would influence Marxism and the doctrine behind Fascism observed that just because men and women may learn about the past that didnt mean theyd make better decisions about the future. In fact he even cynically commented that What experience and history teach us is this that people and governments never have learned anything from history or acted on principles deduced from it." After a decade following the collapse of the Soviet Union America seemingly towered over the world as a great giant and the Atlas among nations hoisting the burdens of world leadership atop her broad shoulders economically culturally and militarily. But today nearly a generation after the terrorist attacks of September 11 2001 its armed services have clashed with the forces of Islamic extremism and terrorism in Afghanistan Iraq and elsewhere in the world ― and have been met with unambiguous failure. Seven years after 9/11 the 2008 worldwide economic crisis laid low the nation with high unemployment an immense federal debt increasingly spiraling out of control a destabilized currency and depressed home values.  I recall the essay by Sir John Grubb (The Fate of Empires) which suggests that the common denominator for most empires is that they last an average of about 250 years paralleling each ones stages of development based on seven steps which he explained chronologically.
  1. The age of outburst (or pioneers).
  2. The age of conquests.
  3. The age of commerce.
  4. The age of affluence.
  5. The age of intellect.
  6. The age of decadence.
  7. The age of decline and collapse.
Each stage helps drive the progression towards the next as the values of the people change over time. Military political economic and religious developments all influence an empires people to act and believe differently over time. The inability for America to recall the full scope of its heritage flies in the face of Mrs. Thatchers points out why the European Union in its own death throes can never be like America given America like Europe seems now to embrace huddled masses who do not embrace American values the American way of life and American opportunities since today half the political divide has ceased to embrace her historic and powerful bonds of patriotism and pride that were the products of philosophy. Because of our understanding of postmodernism and the Hegelian dialectic there may be something to the social inversion even in understanding the humor in explaining how Britain differs from America: The American people view a hundreds as a long time. The British people see 100 miles as a long drive. Clearly Americas present lone-superpower status is being increasingly challenged and very soon its position could be lost completely to Communist China ― a nation whose record of evil and barbarism parallels the bygone empires of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Three questions should be asked: can America rebound? Is Lady Liberty destined to be laid into the same ash heap of history as the other great empires in the past such as Britain Spain Rome Persia Babylon and Egypt; even the Soviet Union? Finally is Americas future more secure than its predecessors or will its accelerated decline finally lead to its collapse? Perhaps a preview of a possible future will paint a realistic portrait of what may come. The new world order as designed by the Globalist Left is an expansion on the crumbling foundation undergirding the European Union ― and features a broad coalition of Western elites deciding the fate of the black and brown people of the former third world. They are their pawns for attaining this and it is on their backs where the green cottage industries are laid. And it is for the women of the Third World to which Democrat politicians like the socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders pledged to direct taxpayer dollars to accelerate the age-old objective to depopulate the impoverished black and brown people of the Global South who being hopelessly poor by his estimation contribute disproportionately to the total carbon blueprint without justifying further increasing their numbers. Green politics like their feminist comrades reek of a memorandum circulated by Dr. Clarence Gamble in November 1939 regarding Suggestions for the Negro Project" which express concerns that black leaders might regard birth control as an extermination plot" while a second project director ever more explicitly doubted if Southern Darkies can ever be entrusted with… a clinic… except under white supervision." Their fears were assuaged by its most notorious co-conspirator Margaret Sanger who said that because the average black is less educated than whites and often highly religious most might not object to a black minister receiving training.  After 243 years America has become a product of history separate from its founding principles inscribed within its Constitution that promoted ancient Judeo-Christian values and embodied within Western philosophy and English legalism. The liberal democratic order (that is liberal democracy) now faces an existential crisis of its own making its guiltiest culprits being the gullible voters who for generations elected individuals with utopian designs appealing to their fantasies driven by passions not grounded in reality. To achieve these goals the Globalist Left must attack our society under three presuppositions.
  1. First reality is ultimately unknowable. The Left must convince a majority of the country that situatedness prevents us from directly accessing the real world or having true knowledge about it. There may be a real world but that can never shed our perspectives to access it. No one has a gods eye view" of reality according to the Postmodern Left; therefore no one can claim to have the truth about it; and
  2. Second truth and knowledge are constructions of language. These reflect the perspective of the one who is claiming but should not be confused as a statement of fact about actual reality. In a liberal democratic such as the West if truth is taught from a young age to merely reflect ones perspective and does not actually represent anything about objective reality it cannot be absolute. Put it simply: the inescapable view here is there is no absolute truth; there are only truths. Those who have an opinion are ostracized or canceled. Those who dont wont; and finally
  3. Third progress is an illusion. This simply breaks down the optimism of Western modernity under the premise that it was based on a false confidence in human objectivity and certainty an idea which over the past decade has been chastened. For the postmodern Left advancement and achievement are socially constructed concepts leftover baggage from modernity which when we attempted to explain the world with metanarratives become expressions of our situatedness that cannot be used to evaluate another culture or another time. Hence this is why racism as a social construct and tribalism have become in themselves ideologies relative to their objectives and why without the concept of progress we question what it means for a society to move forward (and what does forward" mean) as pragmatic observations for ideas expressions and concepts.
In a time where the post-truth world bears witness to the rehabilitation of Karl Marx and Che Guevera from the condemnation of prior history; when Joe Bidens remark that he chooses Truth over facts equally matches the lack of rational thought behind the pearl of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezs wisdom (it is more important to be morally-correct than factually-accurate); or how Bernie Sanders (a pervert who has written about womens rape fantasies) can bring the house down during a CNN Q&A forum by pledging to a feminist that he would have the courage to provide billions of dollars to achieve population control for the poor black and brown peoples in Africa and Asia this kind of moral relativism (amorality) is difficult to confront and effectively fight.
gallery type=rectangular ids=2347323475
In a clash of civilizations in which one will inevitably emerge supreme as a better working option according to the history of the victors something that works in the particular culture (like monogamy) or situation (like an appropriate age of sexual consent) belonging to the victorious power will likely not in another culture or situation and its implementation will be triumph of the will. Hence the debate is revisited over and over: under postmodernism were simply taught to feel not think because thinking implies objectivity. This is why the postmodern Left today relies heavily on applying a linguistic turn to liberally augment their directionless talking points. As Richard Rorty put it To say that truth is not out there is simply to say that where there are no sentences there is no truth that sentences are elements of human languages and that human language are human creations… The world does not speak. Only we do." This flips Heather MacDonalds understanding of the diversity delusion on its ear for most but which she has come to understand perfectly: since we simply cannot escape language in our attempts to describe reality according to Rorty all objectivity is jettisoned.
gallery type=rectangular ids=2347623477
Victor Davis Hanson parallels the rapid globalization which integrates the nations of the world into one political economy with that of the corruption within the Roman Empires hegemony. He notes how this has given rise to an archetype of leaders similar to the historian and later emperor Marcus Aurelius who because he lived a double life of imperial engagement and mental detachment ruled over a Roman Empire that fell into a period of classical impassivity characteristic of latter-day Christian monks who in more dangerous times saw the world around them as incompatible with what was to come and therefore saw engagement as an impediment violating their own Christian belief. More and more according to Hanson Americans today are becoming Stoic dropouts. The relentless mental barrage of political and cultural narratives condemning them as illiberal flies in the face of what is true and for many this is simply too much to bear: theyre certainly not reactionaries racists xenophobes or homophobes but simply exhausted by our frenzied culture." Being told by Barack Obama Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren that you didnt build that parallels the Greek myth of Sisyphus who exists in his nihilistic hell knowing that the boulder will roll back down to its starting point after he is about to push it over the cliff from its apex. Such a relentless echo chamber understandably demoralizes individuals and there are no such things as simply societies without individuals inhabiting them. Society by the terms very nature is meant to dehumanize by erasing the face of souls as unique and varied as they are individual. Yet these are the talking points illustrating why millions will vote for Democrats in the presidential election in November. Increasingly Democratic voters have embraced a postmodern neo-fascist ideology driven by a big tent of ethno-nationalist movements (e.g. black nationalism and to a smaller degree Hispanic nationalism) and identitarian interests (e.g. the LGBTQ movements feminism Islam) vying for dominance over the nation reflecting the mindset of 1930s Germany far more than 1917 Russia. They are also why the Left is breaking apart because in the long run their singular objectives will each unilaterally clash with the other groups. Today unlike in the past all its vast interests cant get along among each other certainly not enough to build any kind of cohesive coalition to win. An example is how black nationalists and LGBTQ movements have feminism under siege and on the brink of extinction by way of legislation and the activist judicial system. Until the past decade that postmodern Democratic coalition hastily formed after the Reagan presidency forced the party to pivot towards the center by 1992 was one of convenience that was effective but could only last so long as it could collectively promote an anti-Western agenda. Now however their agendas are clashing. Very rapidly they are becoming increasingly incompatible. And theyve never been so close to total destruction just as they are on the cusp of constructing the one-party state which every socialist state requires to prevent challenges to its authority. caption id=attachment_32314 align=alignright width=410Lilly Recent Bernie Sanders campaign rally in Venice California. Behind his chief surrogate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez there appears to be an all-white crowd./caption So for the majority of wretches living in Europe and the United States the moral dilemma posed to us by woke white leftists audaciously defining tribal roles in society is this: how dare do we who are genetically predisposed to racism complain about the threat posed to Western civilization by proclaiming moral superiority over races of black and brown people based solely on personal observation and pro-Western bias? If we leave it to the libertarians and those many associated with me call RINOs we can take to heart that the human spirit society even our culture like with economics will self-correct. But the form our future will take may not turn out in the wash the way wed hope or like if we surrender now if we choose as our fate like shadows in a cave the reality that our progeny could live in 1000 years of darkness.  
by is licensed under