caption id=attachment_18173 align=alignnone width=500
Hiding pictures of Democrats socializing with the infamous/caption
Almost 2500 years ago Greek fabulist Aesop sagely advised A man is known by the company he keeps". A modern analogy is seen in whom one chooses to break bread with. This concept particularly applies to the slippery Clintons and the now disgraced movie mogul they chose to dine with on December 13 2016. That Hollywood bigwig is todays accused serial rapist Harvey Weinstein. According to photographsmysteriously only recently uncovered by Britains Daily Mail not the mainstream mediaHillary is seated between two men accused of sexual assault; the other being her husband Bill. Ah the hiddenness" of such open secretsand the curious concealment of related pictures.
Historically Hillary knew about Bills bimbo eruptions" in the 1990s. Another Clintonian open secret: long denied until the irrefutable DNA on Monica Lewinskys blue dress. Likewise in her decades-long friendship with Weinstein is it possible that she didnt know when everyone in Hollywood seemed to? At the exclusive East Harlem eatery called Raosmere weeks after her failed presidential campaignHillary is fraternizing with such a man? Given her stinging political defeat one would reasonably infer she would surround herself with trusted intimates. That means either she didnt know or she didnt care. Either way what would Aesop say about her character or theirs?
The suppression of questionable photos involving prominent Democrats is nothing new. Another telling example is an obscure image taken at a weekly Congressional Black Caucus lunch back in 2005. A single frame shot by Askia Muhammad and hidden by him for 13 years. The main subjects were then freshman senator Barack Obama and the minister Louis Farrakhan: the highly controversial anti-Semitic anti-white and anti-gay leader of the Nation of Islam. (For context per the New York Times Mr. Farrakhan described Adolf Hitler as a very great man" in 1984.) If exposed then what would the electorate have thought of photographic proof of connection between both men?
In any case heres what Mr. Muhammad told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution I swore myself to secrecy. If the picture was exposed it could still be a deal breaker for Obama becoming president. … I did not want to be the instrument of his downfall." His candid response likely explains why Hillarys Weinstein photographs also took so long to surface. Using Aesops standard these images depict associations with dubious characters. Why hide these photos for years unless they symbolize a deeper reality of collective corruption?
