It was supposed to be a phone call for Obama administration ears only. But hear it the radio host did she says. And what she heard should make your blood run cold and perhaps your rage hot. Obamas amnesty plan is to use illegal aliens as seedlings" said the federal officials. They will navigate not assimilate" as they take over the host" create a country within a country" and start pushing the citizens into the shadows."
Welcome to the fundamental transformation" of America.
The above was alleged by WCBM radio co-host Sue Payne in an interview with talk giant Mark Levin last Thursday. Payne says that while at an immigration rally she became privy to three conference calls in which 16 Obama administration officials including Cecilia Muoz director of Obamas White House Domestic Policy Council discussed plans for what could only be called the final destruction of traditional America and the cementing of leftist hegemony. Muoz by the way is perfectly suited to this task; she was once a senior vice president for the anti-American Hispanic lobbying organization the National Council of La Raza.
Oh la raza means the race" (I guess the whole Hispanic is an ethnicity" thing doesnt cut much ice with them).
Payne opened the interview by explaining that what Obama actually did on November 21 the day he signed his supposed executive amnesty was create the Task Force on New Americans" (TFNA) for the purposes of implementing his legalization scheme. And it wont be applied to just 5 million illegals but 13 to 15 million to give protection to and move…on to citizenship" reports Payne.
Payne then said that the illegals labeled seedlings" would eventually take over the host." She continued And the immigrants will come out of the shadows and what I got from the meetings was that they would be pushing the citizens into the shadows. They would be taking over the country; in fact one of the members of the task force actually said that we would be developing a country within a country."
To this nefarious end the goal of the TFNA is to create a welcoming feeling" in illegal-seeded localities which would be redesignated receiving communities." Theyd subsequently be transformed (fundamentally I suppose) into what are labeled emerging immigrant communities" or as some would say Mxico Norte.
The officials also said reports Payne that for the seedlings to grow" they needed fertile soil" (a.k.a. your tax money). The officials stated that the legalized aliens needed to be redesignated as refugees" and be given cash medical care credit cards for purchasing documents and since many illegals will be older Social Security so they can age successfully within their country within a country" to quote Payne. As she then put it its as if we were funding our own destruction here."
Some may point out that Payne has no smoking gun (that we know of) in the form of lets say a recording of the calls. But Levin vetted her and found her credible calling the scheme stunning" and reflective of Maos China." I believe her as well but it doesnt even matter. She simply confirms what Ive been warning of for years and years over and over again: The Left is importing their voters engaging in demographic warfare and authoring the death of the republic.
Mind you legal immigration itself is a sufficient vehicle for this. Ever since the Immigration Reform and Nationality Act of 1965 85 percent of our immigrants have hailed from the Third World and Asia thus growing leftist constituencies that vote for socialistic Democrats by approximately a four-to-one margin; in contrast and as Pat Buchanan pointed out Nearly 90 percent of all Republican votes in presidential elections are provided by Americans of European descent." This along with hatred and bigotry is a major reason why Obama and his ilk want to destroy white America.
But liberals crave immediate gratification and amnesty greatly accelerates this process. Legalize 15 million socialist voters clamoring for handouts have them bring in relatives via chain migration give them Social Security numbers which they can use to vote (as is Obamas plan) and tomorrows leftist dystopia is today. I predicted this in 2008 by the way writing:
The coup de grace Obama will use against rightist opposition is mostly embodied in one word: amnesty. This along with some other measures will both grow the Hispanic voting block and ingratiate Obama to it. This will enable him to create a powerful coalition of blacks young voters and Hispanics that along with the older whites he will be able to retain will constitute an insurmountable electoral force. And this is why amnesty has long been a dream of the Democrats. Even easier than brainwashing new voters (which the media and academia specialize in) is importing them.
Admittedly I can be criticized since the above article is titled How Obama Will Ensure His Victory in 2012." But titles are hooks as much as anything else. And since I dont have a crystal ball just a not yet crystallized brain Id never claim to be able to perfectly predict timing. It also turned out that Obama and the 2009 to 2011Democrat House and Senate were preoccupied with instituting ObamaCare and that the liberal legislators were perhaps too cowardly to face re-election having passed amnesty. Regardless I have another prediction one I hope youll take seriously:
The chances are slim to nil that Obamas amnesty will be stopped legislatively.
Obama against John Boehner is the Beltway Brawler vs. the Beltway Bawler. Moreover I suspect establishment Republicans who just refused to defund Obamas scheme want executive amnesty. Why? Because the issue has been an albatross around their necks. And while they dont have the guts or desire to really stand against Invasion USA they also know voting for amnesty would mean electoral disaster. So let Obama act unilaterally huff and puff a bit with a wink and a nod while doing nothing of substance and Voila!" The issue is off the table with plausible deniability of complicity.
And the courts? They may uphold the recent injunction against Obamnesty but theres no saying Obama wont ignore the courts (he assuredly understands that judicial review is a jurist invention). And anyway amnesty was always only a matter of time with todays cultural trajectory. Yet this cloud does have a silver lining.
The Left was very successful boiling the frog slowly with the legal importation of socialist voters and the gradual transformation of our culture via entertainment the media and academia. But liberals childish haste may have led to a tactical error. By going all in on executive orders and amnesty by transitioning from evolutionary to revolutionary change and turning the burner up high the Left risks rousing that frog from his pan. And how should it jump?
Obama said after the November Republican victory that it was his profound preference and interest to see Congress act on a comprehensive immigration reform bill" (emphasis added) but otherwise hell work via executive orders. He also offered the GOP a deal: You send me a bill that I can sign and those executive actions go away."
Translation: My preference is to follow the Constitution.
But my will be done one way or the other.
How to respond? Question: what do you do when someone says My preference is to follow the games rules but if I cant win that way Ill have to cheat"? You can:
- Continue losing; be a Charlie Brown sucker who keeps thinking that this time Lucy wont pull the football away.
- Cheat right back (hard to do without judges in your pocket).
- Stop playing the game.