<i>The New Yorkers</i> Failed Pathetic Attack on Chick-fil-A

width=500 Chick-fil-A stores are popping up in Manhattan and one of the uppity liberals who writes for The New Yorker isnt happy. Dan Piepenbring has written a vicious piece denouncing the popular chain for everything from its Christian ownership to its adorable cow ads. In Chick-fil-As Creepy Infiltration of New York City" he gripes that the fast-food giant is replacing mom-and-pop restaurants in NYC. But where was he when McDonalds and Starbucks started replacing them? The truth is Piepenbring wouldnt be attacking Chick-fil-A if its WinShape Foundation hadnt donated to causes dedicated to the sanctity of marriage. He uses it as a ruse to attack all kinds of things about the chain absurd things. He exaggerates the Christian aspects of Chick-fil-A portraying them as annoying in-your-face features of the chain. He refers to this derisively as pervasive Christian traditionalism." He cannot hide his contempt for Christians. But for the average person eating at Chick-fil-A they likely wouldnt notice much of a difference between the chain and a McDonalds. He is disgusted that Chick-fil-As headquarters in Atlanta is adorned with Bible verses and a statue of Jesus washing a disciples feet." But again the average person eating at the chain would not see this. Read the rest of the article at The Stream
by is licensed under