
Last Sunday lunchtime we were boarding a flight to Mexico via Houston Texas and we presented six valid British passports. As soon as the Continental Airlines security guy saw my passport he shook his head. Were you born in New York? he asked. Have you ever carried an American passport? Yes I said but it had long since expired. I am afraid we have a problem he said. The US Immigration say you have to travel on an American passport if you want to enter the United States. B-but Im British I said and my children chorused their agreement. Had the guy stuck around a moment longer I would have told him how jolly British I was but luckily for him hed gone off in search of reinforcements. When the ranking officer arrived the story was the same. Im sorry sir he said but youll have to go to the US Embassy tomorrow morning and get a new American passport. But I dont want an American passport I said inspiration striking me. I tell you what: I renounce my American citizenship. I disclaim it. I discard it. Thats not good enough sir he said. I need some official document saying that you are no longer American and that of course is the point of this piece. I make this formal public and I hope legally valid renunciation because as a result of this moronic rule I had to ask my wife (who bore this latest cock-up with amazing good humour) to take the children on her own to Houston and I then had to spend a stonking sum on another ticket. Because the Americans insisted I was American and that it was only as an American that I could travel to America America was the one country that I had to avoid. So I circumnavigated America. I flew via Madrid managing to beat the rest of my family to Mexico by 45 minutes; and yet I still seethe. Its not just the stupidity of the rule that gets me. Its the arrogance. What other country insists that because you can be one of its nationals then you must be one of its nationals? Imagine if we told all British-born Americans that they could not arrive in this country except by use of a British passport. I havent seen anything so insanely possessive since the negotiations on the Common Fisheries Policy when the Irish used to claim that the cod stocks of the Atlantic were still Irish in their fishy souls even though they had long since emigrated to Portuguese waters.Such forthright fury at bureaucratic idiocies in the blog of an elected official is endearing. Research indicates that Mayor Johnson may have not submitted the requisite attendant paperwork to make his renunciation take legal effect. Mayor Johnson kindly never file such papers! Uncle Sam wants you! British Prime Minister David Cameron recently was reported to celebrate Mayor Johnsons reported ambition to become British PM.
Following mounting speculation about Mr Johnson wanting to become prime minister Mr Cameron said: It wouldnt be a great job to have if people didnt want it. There is nothing ignoble about wanting my job."Why however should Mayor Johnson stop at PM? Imagine if you will Johnson elected to and simultaneously occupying the offices of prime minister of the United Kingdom and the presidency of the United States. This as nothing else would bring America back together with our affectionate mother country. It certainly would make our special relationship incalculably more special. The U.S. Constitution of course holds that No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them shall without the consent of the Congress accept of any present emolument office or title of any kind whatever from any king prince or foreign state." Thus to bring our two nations back together under a common head of government would require either the consent of the Congress … or in the absence of that the services of a team of particularly astute lawyers. Surely the Congress which magnanimously bestowed upon Winston Churchill American citizenship would not withhold its consent from a natural born citizen to occupy the office of presidency merely because he also was serving as British prime minister. But … if it did … Prime Minister President Johnson simply might decline to take up occupancy of the Prime Ministers physical office thereby coming into technical compliance. Constitutional interpretations have turned on much finer distinctions. Johnson could conduct Great Britains business from an iPad instead of the office. Offices are so yesterday. Norwegian prime minister Jens Stoltenberg governed Norway from his iPad while marooned at JFK yes from American soil during that volcanic eruption in Iceland four years ago. A precedent has been set. This should suffice. Now this columnist has certain policy quibbles with Mayor Johnson. For example how dare he make such cavalier statements about the Irish stand on the Common Fisheries Policy? Yet consider the photos of Johnson wearing a hard hat holding two British flags and dangling helplessly from a defective zip line in Victoria Park during the London 2012 Olympic celebrations. These images alone should be ample to win the hearts and votes of all but the unkindest voters. Some things trump even policy. The cause of reuniting the United States of America and the United Kingdom is one of these. It is existential and trumps the merely prudential. And Mayor Johnson? Should Scotland decide next September to disunite from the United Kingdom … would it not be a wonderful feather for the Crown worn by Her Majesty for you to be preparing so splendidly to augment the Realm? (If only for 8 years. Much can happen in 8 years. The United Kingdom And States of America?" UKSA?" It has a certain ring.) Existential unity. Faulty zip line whimsy. Blogger candor. But wait. Theres more. Both Senator Paul and Mayor Johnson have a signature winsome tousle. Coincidence? Perhaps. Yet perhaps not. Perhaps … a heretofore unrecognized common theme? This columnist dearly hopes that Sen. Paul or another equally worthy while slightly more native figure chooses to run. If not however Mayor Johnson is a naturally born American citizen. Plan B for Boris." And welcome to the UKSA!