Canada did away with its firearms registry in 2012.
When Senator Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation last week to reinstate the assault weapons ban the veteran California Democrat also proposed a national gun registry. The registry would apply to all legally owned weapons grandfathered prior to the assault weapons ban taking effect.
Canadians are all too familiar with gun registries. In 1995 the Liberal government of Jean Chrtien passed the Firearms Act which established the Canadian Firearms Registry. It was a white elephant plagued by cost overruns in the hundreds of millions of dollars and was the target of frequent criticism by Sheila Fraser Canadas former Auditor General. Noted conservative Canadian journalist Peter Worthington wrote Gun registry is little but an expensive unnecessary largely useless waste of time. Bureaucratic boondoggle aptly describes the program."
The Conservative Party long vowed to scrap the gun registry when it came to power. Although Stephen Harpers Tories ousted the Liberals from power in 2006 they did not have a majority in parliament until after the 2011 election. Last year the Tories finally abolished the Canadian Firearms Registry. Shortly before the House of Commons held its final vote on the matter Public Safety Minister Vic Toews told reporters It does nothing to help put an end to gun crimes nor has it saved one Canadian life. This is simply an attempt to make people feel safe rather than doing something substantive in criminal law."
The Canadian Firearms Registry has become such an albatross that even Liberal politicians now want no part of it. Last December Liberal leadership hopeful Justin Trudeau (the eldest son of the late Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau) said The long gun registry as it was was a failure and Im not going to resuscitate that." Trudeaus main leadership rival Marc Garneau (who is best known as Canadas first man in space) made similar comments. Its gone now" he said. The Conservatives have killed it. Lets move on to other things. It is not my intention to spend more money to bring it back."
So if Canada doesnt need a national gun registry why do we?
Now it is true that even without the firearms registry Canada still has far stricter gun laws than the United States. That said there are only two things accomplished by compelling law abiding gun owners to register their weapons with the federal government. The first is that it gives the federal government more power and control over our day-to-day lives. The second is that it gives the federal government yet another opportunity to create a bloated bureaucracy and as a consequence expand the deficit.
If the Clinton-era ban on assault weapons couldnt prevent the Columbine massacre what makes anyone think that a national gun registry is going to prevent another Newtown? Come to think of it there is a third thing that is accomplished by compelling law abiding gun owners to register their weapons with the federal government. By putting pressure to bear on law-abiding gun owners it gives the appearance that the federal government is doing something about a social problem and thus justifies its existence. That doing something often does more harm than good almost never enters into the equation.
In an era where big government is practiced by both Democrats and Republicans the hardest thing in the world is to do nothing. This is especially true when you dont get good press for it or for that matter any press at all. After all when is the last time you heard a contemporary politician say The government which governs least governs best"? You certainly wont hear it from a politician who is about to get money for his or her congressional district or state. You certainly wont hear it from a politician who is about to break ground on the construction of the headquarters of the new national gun registry.
In which case it is up to private citizens to help our elected officials cast their eyes north of the border. If Canada can survive without a national firearms registry then so can we.