The biased MSMs vested interest in a Hillary Clinton presidency/caption
If it were not for double standards liberals politicians and the MSM would have no standards at all." - WMALs conservative radio personality Chris Plante
When extreme leftist klansman David Duke announced public support for a Donald Trump presidency the MSM wrongly smeared the Republican candidate for the endorsement. Honestly in what sane world is any candidate responsible for any nutcase who chooses to back him? If American culture consistently demonstrates anything its that it takes all kinds of people freely making choices for their own reasons. Thats democracy.
Yet this jaded presentation of information was not journalisms objective reporting of facts but naked partisanship based upon false innuendo. For starters a racist anti-suffrage klansman will never populate the party of Abraham LincolnRepublicans then as nowthats the Democrats department. Before one jumps to the erroneous conclusion that liberals arent that way" anymore which of todays political parties bases its polarizing narratives on irrelevancies like gender identity? Which partys candidate says: elect me because Im a woman? Furthermore which party successfully counted on another superficiality that of race over the last eight disastrous years?
Even the educated are fooled that the Democrats atoned" for their disgraceful pro-slavery history with the passage of Lyndon Baines Johnsons holy grail": the 1964 Civil Rights bill. However what is always true of progressivesthen with Johnson now with Clintonis that things below the surface of their media-spun actions dont line up with truth. At the time LBJ admitted privately his real agenda:
Ill have those n*ggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years!"
Started in the 20th century and carried forward what accompanied the good anti-discrimination statutes were invisible economic chains that have tricked generations of minorities into the barest government-supported subsistence in exchange for becoming loyal Democratic voting blocs. This dynamic is better known as the Democrats poverty plantation. How else does one explain 90 of Afro-Americans supporting Republicans in Lincolns time but only approximately 10 more recently?
Minorities are perpetually infantilized; convinced by Democrats via their MSM creature that obtaining a free identity card is a bridge too far to cross. That such a standard applied to anyone of voting age is somehow surreptitiously racist. Yet as anyone sensible knows an ID is a basic modern necessity. How else does one open a bank account get a job or legally drive a car? As president only Barack Obama doesnt need one. While he habitually golfs with millionairesand parties with billionaireshis wholly abandoned Chicago fellows eek out impoverished lives in inner city slums more dangerous than some Middle Eastern war zones. Only the most extraordinary individualsa select few like Dr. Ben Carsonrise from such humble beginnings to enjoy our now debt-ridden capitalistic system. If Hillarys advocacy of Bernie Sanders style socialism is the path to mass prosperity wouldnt brainy Mr. Carson support her?
Speaking of unhinged support for a corrupt liar we arrive at the funny farm of colorful characters that actually do endorse this Clintonian hydra of American scandal. While the media has ensured nutter David Duke is a household name the powers-at-be have ignored John Bachtell. (Jeopardy" champions does that guy ring a bell for you?) Mr. Bachtellan outspoken Hillary advocateis the little known chairman of the Communist Party of the United States.
Think hes just an exception to the rule? Lets try the better known two-faced Seddique Mateen a vocal Taliban supporter (read: pro-terrorism) and simultaneous lip service apologist for his jihadist mass murdering son. (The younger Mateen Omar slaughtered 49 innocents at the Orlando gay nightclub Pulse.) Unlike Trump the objective" press did not take Hillary Clinton to task for not disavowing Seddiques clapping presence at her Kissimmee rally (ironically featuring a speech about the tragedy). For his part obviously the elder Mateen felt quite comfortable in Mrs. Clintons company. He even told a local TV affiliate: I was invited by the Democratic Party."
Naturally the Clinton camp denied Seddiques claimmuch as they habitually deny every unsavory reality related to their candidate. The press has not followed up on the matter. Nor are they ever likely to. Why? For one thing 93 of journalists self-identify as Democrats. Moreover as with all contemporary Clinton wrongdoing one must heavily factor money into the equation (read: Clinton Cash). Thus the larger answer lies in the fact that as of 2011 6 conglomerates control 90 of the legacy media. Given all of the kid glove fawning coverage of Hillary Clinton what are the odds that virtually all of these corporate behemoths are not contributors to her charitable foundation" and/or her presidential campaign?
As Charity-gate has already demonstrated dead broke" Hillary peddles high level government influence for an ill-gotten 238 million dollar personal fortune. Undoubtedly the liberal media has met Mrs. Clintons asking price. Therefore they have both a philosophical bias and a substantial investment in her presidency. Simply put the fix is in. In effect the MSM functions as the propagandist arm of the anti-JFK Democratic Party. All of the above truths are easily obscured buried under an avalanche of 24-hour MSM spin.
David L. Hunter is an Associate Editor at Capitol Hill Outsider. Hes on Twitter and blogs at davidlhunter.blogspot.com. He is published in The Washington Post The Washington Times FrontPage Mag and extensively in Patriot Post Canada Free Press and American Thinker.