(picture source: )
There is a saying that you must learn from a teacher to become better at what you are. I did that through a few phases of my life. If creativity is meant to come from a teacher it wasnt a teacher in school or a book that inspired me but both of them. Its the problem of having so many influences that you dont analyze and find what makes you worthy than what you are copying. Copying plagiarism is anathema to a person like myself that finds creativity the bedrock of my artistic endeavors. Its a philosophy and a lifelong message I have longed to live in every fiber of my being. I know that not every artist tends to live the life they want in order to feel artistic. Many artists such as novelists even when popular do speaking gigs and interviews about books or what the current state of politics is. Politics is anathema for the creative soul. If you love everyone fine then love everyone. Fuck horses if you love them so much but a horse cannot be creative. A horses creative aspect is to procreate thats it.
It just is acting out its natural DNA that it was assigned by its genetics. Yes there are stories about horses but they have more to do with how we interpret them. Its a promising idea to want to know what animals think but even Animal Farm George Orwell represented the worst of what humans could do to each other so did animals. Creativity is a cycle that moves in underground cults never in mainstream media. The press wishes to be free so it can speak its opinion but when the business of free speech" means doxing people for an opinion then it means something different. Creativity in its essence must come from a teacher that has the students best interest at heart. Since creativity must also come from studying classic work of literature its the artists job to make his own stamp in the creative world but no longer is the single perception of life one to just study and never inhabit the creative toils.
Being creative isnt talking about it either. Talking about creativity only means you have not put in the good work to be able to express it on paper or whatever medium you are choosing to discuss your ideas on. A problem with creativity is that if it does come from a teacher the students wants to appeal to the teacher. A clear reciprocity of the will is not like those who have already changed their mind in order to please the teacher but its not the teacher that must be pleased but the student who capitulates their love and affection for the mastery of the craft. The craft must come from extra circular studies that is not solely inspired from the teacher. Its a reasonable effort to want to please the teacher but I was always one to buck trends and make sure that my own voice was heard over the assignment. Maybe this pissed off my teachers but I felt invincible to want to challenge my teachers which was the opposite of pure satisfaction.
I mostly received middle to bad grades because I didnt follow their assignment. I found it easier to piss in the eye than take it up the ass. It was not my decision to do this but a will far beyond my superiors and teachers. I know that I was merely fighting an uphill battle but I had not yet found the confidence to do the work and be satisfied with the work they were giving me. Teaching is about learning to subjugate the will and find the essence of looking at the lost dimensions until the single presence looks back into the sky and we all look at ourselves in the way we should. From a distance.
A moment must come first and then the critique. What teachers taught me is that you must allow yourself to be the person you want but also back up what you say in a debate. What the clear promise of showing all your sources is guiding your rationale. It was merely the chance to become the person you see in this article. In this article I am handsome ripped women swooning over my throne but the real world look is rather off kilter. The essence of holding too much power in a work of art is knowing that you must achieve perfection even if people dont see it as perfection. If a review of my novel says Its complicated" you have done a good thing.
If you have pissed the establishment off you have done the best work you could do. Yes while it may not look good you are only studying it in depth. Sometimes being called complicated" is like untucking a shirt out of your pants. It shows you have skill and determination to treat the audience with respect and let them see that you arent afraid of taking risks. Thats Impulse.
The problem with impulse is that sometimes its not always the same thing that will make us seem approachable. Its creative impulse that can make a hot item the next best thing to crowdfund. The honesty of what makes creativity inspiring is that while creativity is the essence of knowing the sheer impulse beyond what makes your own words resonate with people. Its the distinct fervor of the individual that makes Creativity soar. Sometimes it doesnt have to do with public opinion. Public opinion is merely one aspect of Creativity. The Impulse is that while something may sound astute might not yet become the same problem they know would always search outward in the same breath. Searching outward is not where creativity comes from. The essence of creativity is knowing that you thought up what you believe and didnt come from someone else.
All I see online is that people repost news articles but its not an original idea. It makes the world seem as close minded as we can be. We have to hear the continued perception of our inner voice. The inner voice is a part of impulse and creativity. Inner voices allow us to speak what we really feel and exterior voices are just as explanatory as he said she said" and no matter what people find in the same absolute perfection of knowing that no matter the problem at hand inner voices and exterior voices meet at the creative impulse. Creativity is very fascinating. It means you must use metaphor to explain what really hides within you. Its not hiding if its creative.
The moment creativity meets an art form real world violence is averted. The outcome is that no more the same problems that are met with creativity is where the world meets together when art and words meet. If one thinks they are merely regurgitating what they hear will make them original thats why the arts has become less enthralling as of late. The problem with the arts right now is that it must take an anti-republican stance that only makes the world unbearable and all art meaningless. Its a reason why most of the world has abandoned movies and the ones they go see are not going to make the critics happy. When critical consensus meets public opinion its very rarely that they often do meet at the same time. While Lord of the Rings are the best films that one can make the critics loved them and the audience did as well.
Thats a rare occasion and last of a dying breed that creativity helps within the same momentum. The clear destruction of those who have forgotten what it means to be creative are often disgruntled at the way society is e.g. modern leftism. The pure application of knowing what makes something creative is why criticism is disdained by the public at large. Creativity should and always be statements that no longer look at the responsible momentum as those who yet speak the same message. Its a responsible effort to make sure that Creativity must be balanced with the healthy dose of two opinions that equal up two halves of society i.e. a character who hates immigrants versus an immigrant who helps the character see that hes just the same as the character who hates immigrants.
Its the polarization of creativity that makes the world a happier place. Its Creativity that can get people into trouble sometimes. Creativity should and largely get people into trouble. If Salman Rushdie is an example he must be stated as the righteous heir to creativity since Calvino. Pissing off the leader of Iran comes almost as a mistake since there are so many other offensive works of literature that makes Creativity dangerous to Islam is that Salman Rushdie was unapologetic in his approach to the way Muhammed was projected in his work The Satanic Verses. Creativity means that by offense its largely misunderstood.
Misunderstood Creativity is what makes up most offensive art. If Jackson Pollack pisses you off its probably because you are a pissed off artist that doesnt see the value in his work. This is what makes Creativity misunderstood. Misunderstanding is a part of what makes humans effortlessly conducive to terrorism. As George Carlin said Israelis are called freedom fighters while the Arabs are called terrorists." Its a part of the cycle of being creative. People have different names for things.
Being misunderstood is a part of what we think is the basic understanding that most human beings must come to appreciate. People are different by default and should we all agree on the same idea is preposterous. Being Creative and misunderstood comes back to critics who think they see a problem when the text was written to be read that way to begin with. If we are to put William Burroughs and Ginsberg up to puritanical standards of the left today who dont appreciate creativity they would be run out of the business. I guess some people would love the idea of being a champion of freedom of speech until their bank accounts and money start drying up and they are ostracized from society.
But creativity must be able to stand both against the masses and those who would destroy the art. In Ecce Homo Nietzsche describes from Zarusthra is that whoever wants to become a creator in good or evil must first be a destroyer and dismantle values. Therefore the greatest evil is part of the greatest goodness; but this is being creative" (Nietzsche Frederick. Ecce Homo. P. 132).
The problem of being creative is that you must either willingly or not destroy what you mean to create but most of all the problem is neither the essence of good or evil but you must be an iconoclast that destroys ideas and must be willing to do both good and evil in essential creativity. The understanding of creativity is that there can always be a villain hero or neither. Sometimes art can be represented as humans living as they always do but Creativity is also becoming a part of the individual. The Individual must become the Creative gust of wind that inspires someone to become a hero or a villain. Sometimes its characters who live their life the way they want that helps creativity foster a new age in the digital world. But maybe we are looking at this too closely?
Whether good or evil is represented creativity must be willing to stand up to criticism on both sides of the field. The problem with associating the creative with one who stands up for speech related arguments is what makes the world a safer place. The Creative impulse must stand up for whats right even in the face of danger. Nietzsche would argue this would be the case against religion but being creative is breaking all the rules in order to be free of what we used to believe.
Whether by force or rendition Creativity must blossom to the foremost bubble of thoughts who have created such a place in the highest regard of Creative impulse. The problem is that no one wants to stand up for the creative act that we would rather nullify those sensations and it will come out against people who think differently. Those are people to stay away from. They think they have good ideas but they are merely just a slave to the idea of staying true to their own beliefs. The Creative Impulse must be at the height of superiority but also remember where he must stay in order to reflect the necessary damage of not only operating at the highest qualm but the dove who speaks into the ear that no one else hears. Doves devils angels all have come to the same appropriate measure of Creative Impulse. All must learn their own way and break through the outer shell where the depth of knowing such a will power forgets itself in the way others tend to think.
Move in both goodness and evil because in the Creative Impulse we are the very essence of what makes Creativity move. Creativity is useless in the same way others tend to think it might benefit them. It would get them through mind numbing jobs if they didnt have a guilty conscience over not writing. A writer must write even if being poor is the fate of most creative people. Its unfair but the best are often overlooked until they are dead. But also to bring back the German Philosopher Nietzsche in Ecce Homo You pay dearly to be immortal; you have to die several times during your lifetime." (108).
No one likes this but there is another essence to Creativity. The Deceptive Inferior mindset. Deception is knowing that artists are lying. The reality of those who have yet fostered a stable connection is those who have seen the best look as they fostered the will to create itself in the same honor of will power but the experience of knowing what silences those who have seen what the stable form of creativity takes it must always be missing something. Perfection is what is called Mary Sue" and no matter what people say those characters are not human beings. Mary Sues are the exemplary female woman that doesnt exist. If its not feminine in any way that people can relate to it its a Mary Sue.
The Deceptive Inferior mindset is that problems always occur but sometimes from within. Its the anima that must meet the males status of what makes them look as though they sit as close as they do to the edge of a story. Knowing this is the same as those who never once see themselves in the character. Men need a woman to take up the feminine cycle of the relationship. A problem of those who have yet to experience a skill to follow such a will to attest the same might yet consciously look forever in the same moment of artistic endeavor. Mary Sues are not the characters that neither men or females relate to. Problems that create what they know in the hope that neither the essence of creating such a power in the hope that each might yet infuse the same models of ideology over aesthetic. Nietzsche would have probably hated the way ideology has taken over aesthetic and now there is no truer moment than today when we look at what has created itself. Captain Marvel is the clear example of what makes itself a parody of chosen implications of what writers think they can give women but it merely only turns them in to an SJW writer with no real aesthetic to turn to.
Aesthetics is what makes the Deceptive Inferior mindset intriguing. Perfection is only better in heros who have no other choice but to fight evil because they have to" and have no real other motive. Deceptive inferior mindset can be seen in what makes the clear introspective nature. What Mary Sue characters cant do is find a multiple choice way of telling a story as one must be subjective in finding the element of creativity authentic as possible. Authentic interpretations are apparat of the Deceptive Inferior mindset.
It shows that while the promise of knowing the simpler justification of a character one must be able to avoid the higher road of storytelling. Sometimes the characters must get dirty and be dirty to know that they are still in fact a part of the world. A weakness is what makes a character relatable in the hands of an authentic creative person. An unreliable narrator is also attributed to the Deceptive Inferior mindset.
The perception of what makes the understanding closely behave as those who have seen what makes itself a true inspiration to behold. Mary Sue characters do not have imperfections. They are boring and they offer nothing of themselves. The Deceptive Inferior mindset is that nothing is off the table. Each tableau must be investigated to show what the inspiration of how much one can create a personifying gesture of those who have seen what they know in the basic understanding of how much a person can move backwards in order to move forwards. A notion of how much a simpler motivation in the Deceptive Inferior mindset creates a distance of how much one can relate to the work through an understanding of how much a character can become a part of the psyche. The writer must also see the character as a part of the psyche in order to find a strong promise of the Deceptive inferior mindset.
The problem is when weak writers try to find problems they try to answer them and answering problems have no real solution but more problems on top of them. Guessing is still the inspiration of knowing what clearly follows the problem of knowing the same power might yet inspire those who have seen a true horror to put it down into words and sink into the floor and know that the true questions always lead to more questions and answers are merely just a last promise of infinite boredom.
Creativity means you must plunge into the darkness and however consciously looking like the problem you must forget polite manners. Only a prudish person looks down on cursing. Another Mary Sue or a male feminist would say something like that. Its the conscious effort of knowing that creativity is something that you cant control either. Thriller writers often plan out their work but planning it out is another version of a rough draft. True works of art cant be planned out as a true master story teller knows all of it must come from a painful wound. The creation of the Mary Sue is what makes true writers of intelligence just shake their head or smh as the young say.
What becomes of a Mary Sue is a part of a cultural moment that perceptively look at one another and dont see anybody different. Creative people should hate the Mary Sue and reject it at all cost. The problem of knowing the power of weakness is that you can create endearing and powerful characters within them. Cinematic examples are Terminators Sarah Connor Ellen Ripley from Alien and Alita from Alita Battle Angel. Its those characters that show the experience of what simply look together in the same vision of what is a weak character who turns strong but retains feminine qualities. A problem of knowing that weakness is a part of the human psyche must come to the same position they always do is that turning a weakness into a strength knowingly decides what the promise of simpler thoughts of imperfections are still showing how someone might become strong out of a desperate situation. The perception of how strength and quality are those who have yet followed some impression of near quixotic relationships. Relationships are also a part of the Creative impulse. Dante Alighieri descends into hell for Beatrice in the Inferno.
He faints but its his weakness that we find admirable. Feminist would probably argue a story where the Inferno is told from Beatrices point of view but this is the reason why most leftists cant grasp the art of storytelling anymore. The perception of the female is what makes the connection between both the male Anima and the opportunity of those who have seen what the world can make out of troubling perspectives.
Its Beatrices death that motivates Dante to rescue her from hell but its the reason why most of the wisdom given to us in creativity is the impulse to create something that will last throughout the ages. Women characters have always been a sign of wisdom and fertility in the age of cinema and in art but the perception of all perfect characters with no flaws is not good storytelling. Its the reason why most movies today are often met horribly by the audience. Its not the growing male audience in comics literature etc that makes female characters interesting but they have to be genuine. Both Ellen Ripley and Sarah Conner are genuine characters that are believable.
Yes believable. Believable characters dont exist in the Mary Sue archetypes. They are the reason why most cinema and art fail and most artists never see the way out of a tunnel vision career. Art is meant to be subjective turning the eye away from the masses concerns and onto the individual. Rugged Individualism sounds like a phrase out of the American West. Its the determination of characters who seek a refuge from the wilderness of society and become people of sound mind body and character. Individualism and the characters who are individuals are the reason why most art and literature stands the test of time. The Terminator Alita Alien and The Inferno all are about individuals coming to find the strength of courage that most other people who tend to stay in groups think they can make it out of rough scenarios. Rugged Individualism comes from a place of courage and even in the old West this proved to be true. Westerns and sci-fi share a common theme but what about all around?
Its the appearance of being tough over looking tough. Creative impulse must also be embedded within Rugged Individualism. The problem of art is that it no longer seems to look as if the Individual matters. Creativity must come from a deep raw character that holds itself among the entire perfect connection of those who have seen what may come to finalize the weapon of Rugged Individualism.
Creativity must come from within and its why so many characters must have obstacles in order to face them. Its the result of knowing the perception of how much a character can grow from being nave to smart and rugged. The clarity of Rugged Individualism is the same opportunity of finding what makes a central character strong enough to fight their way out of tough scenarios. Moby Dick is a good example. Ishmael is the only character left to survive after Ahab and the whale die in a brutal show at the end but its obsession that remains within Ahab. His hatred against the whale is the counterbalance to Ishmael who seems more interested in just making a living.
The notion that Ishmael lives at the end is that his lack of obsession makes him a cause for how one can survive at the end of a long journey swept up on the high seas and knowing that Rugged Individualism is how most characters live at the end of a horrifying journey. The idea that no longer looks at what makes the sign over the novel OBVIOUS" makes us know that Creative impulse is the way that most artist give us such wisdom and knowledge through story and happy enough to remain an individual in the overall arc of life. But Creativity must retain that individualism or the idea that people are only designed to be fated by destiny cannot truly overcome their destiny.
The experience of destiny is that no character can have a fate that offers them a happy ending. Each Greek myth blatantly as Oedipus knows that without some key information he will only lead to his destruction by killing his father and marrying his mother because he never met them in the first place and also the Oracle warned his father that it would happen if he didnt get rid of the child showing that Oracles will often try to interfere with the world of the characters.
Yes while this isnt a new example this is an idea where individualism is thwarted by the Oracles who know what is about to happen in the world and problems that arise out of Greek tragedies are the impotence of how a story can be controlled from the very beginning. Its not like there is a pattern of how Individualism is always thwarted by Deus Ex Machinas where the hero needs the help of the Gods to push him towards his goal but the problem of the universe interfering with the Individual has always been a problem with most books concerning that meaning of fate and how a character without powers can fight their way on their own. The instance of knowing such problems are best understood by the root of the inner conflict is also what makes Greek Tragedies an example as how most characters are given a free pass in order to achieve their quest. Its the unknowing of Oedipus who destroys himself at the end that makes the world of Oedipus resonates to today.
The problem of knowing what fate holds for us is a nightmare and creativity should always hold certain things from the characters even if the audience knows it when they read it. The destination is what most other perfections are just as close to the same identity of the unknown and no matter the problems associated with the journey the end of Oedipus proved that it was scripted from the beginning and sometimes a mystery that is truly genuine is what make the reader contemplate the idea that we are all merely just moved toward destinys grasp. The imminent problem of knowing such a wisdom must never be known to the character and whether the problem is merely one associated by the fate of gentle meanderings its the common misconception that knowing will make characters happier.
Even then the decision to know is the same as falling short of destiny. It was Oedipuss destiny to kill his father and marry his mother because it was his destiny. Individualism matters little in Greek Mythology but Rugged Individualism is what makes the journey meaningful. The instance of how a journey can destroy one in the end is what most characters and people have to live with. Happy endings are few and far between and great sacrifices are meant in order to find the ending meaningful. A dark tale doesnt mean it always meant to reflect the person reading it but maybe help them understand some painful moment in their life. If we dont question things we are merely fated to live by what fate will merely give us.
Creativity and Impulse are still motions. Psychological depth is what will help characters become better or worse people today. What most Creatives tend to think is that novels are about good people. Being good doesnt make you a good person. It might help with pleasant conversations. Its a problem when Creativity must deal with only being good but they show how bland they are and they learn nothing from their experiences on the page. Those used to be called static characters but the idea that this is the new norm is what makes it disturbing. Being friendly only yields one result. Yes being good doesnt make you bad or evil but boring. Boring characters are meant to help the main character hold such persuasion in the way others look at themselves.
The perception of goodness is a stilting problem in the way most other works of art tend to act towards. Its conflict that makes a hero become a villain or a villain turn into a hero. The compromise is that the story must retain the balance between creative impulse and the problems that they must figure out. Decisions in art must remain fluid and impulsive but yield the ingenious notion that no longer ascribes the character in simple terms. Psychological depth must also prove that impulsiveness guided by the design of natural causes proves what makes psychological depth disturbing. Sometimes its a villain that can make people the question of their safety but also if they share some qualities with them. The outcome in the hands of a great artist know that they have already come into existence as the same response to what a good person should do but they have already reminded themselves what they must not do in order to survive.
Being afraid of breaking the law is also a reminder that this is not going to stop people from committing crimes. Its usually the little details of what can drive people to cause crimes to happen. People are not born evil but society can turn a good person into a villain overnight. Recent examples of this is Todd Philips Joker (2019). Creative Impulse must let creative people explore the psychological dysfunction that will allow them to be creative and explore what their real feelings hold. Just because art must dwell in darkness its that psychological depth that makes the lonely person feel less alone. The outcome is that while the problem is not only mischaracterized but its not seen as good if it doesnt follow PC standards. Its the problem of fake inclusivity" that doesnt allow art to flourish but its the opposite of acceptance. Its a problem of trying to make art a safe space without provocation.
Making things safe doesnt mean its how personal growth will happen. Its a conscious effort to remain blind to the facts of society but when often or not art must be constrained to invisible inclusivity" that makes the deception of growth meaningless. Progressivism only means one must act well in society but then do things in private the same way as always. If you havent made one mistake in your life you havent grown at all. Thats what makes people merely static and they dont realize it until they have pushed everyone away with their ideals but they are wandering why am I alone?" and why doesnt art behave the way I do?" Answer: Art is not supposed to behave in the way most people interact with people. Messed up people create art not good people.
But the problem is that psychological depth must provoke and entertain and destroying psychological depth for happy thoughts" isnt art and should not be treated as a medium for progressive" false behavior. The deception of acting nice but then turning on people for little things is what makes the world far less bearable. Its why art must remain a dejected art form which is why art has always dealt with depression anxiety and most of all a problem merely reductive in the same way that art must progress is a false lie being taught at universities. PC behavior makes one more entrenched in villainy which has nothing to do with progressive behavior at all. Being free from progressive thoughts may help art and what people continue to think is good art. Comedy which should be allowed to talk freely in Creativity and impulse is what makes the world bearable.
Comedic Intrusion is the world that allows such permission to be granted. Laughter at an enemy proves you have control over them. Never once think that the conversation that takes place is supposed to be serious or lacking what they prove as real. In comedy everything is a force of creative impulse. The problem of having to design comedy to work for a scripted reaction will only prove meaningless to the world watching art. Marvel movies only know that comedy would kill them in the end and this proved well with Endgame (2019) that the greatest ally humor was their weakest link.
Comedians prove that with each joke they are taking shots at people because comedy must be offensive in order to provoke a reaction. Comedy written from a progressive" or inclusive" demeanor only proves that nothing is funny and jokes cannot be made for the sake of an audience that doesnt care about their art. Progressive comedy has always been regressive in nature. Laughter can kill any serious situation. Life and death can prove to be funny when in the hands of a master. In Salo or the 120 Days of Sodom both deceptively move the situation the Castle (in the novel) and World War 2 Italy (movie) remain as promising to the debate over what can make Art great while exploring the psychological disparity of evil and what makes people good or not. There is no problem with either works of Art.
Except when a society cant handle the severity of the text or film and can misinterpret metaphors for real life. It cost Paolo Pasolini his life after an enraged movie goer was so mad about the movie he shot and killed the director for making the film. Its frightening when filmmakers and novelists cant be protected for the art they make but what would the world have been like without the Marquis or Pasolini? The very essence of Marquis De Sades speech was seen as a threat to public society. The problem is someone mistook his blasphemes as literal and not metaphorical. What China is doing in 2019 to its citizens is what the Catholic Church did in the time of the Marquiss writing. If a writer is censored by either a government or religious affiliation they are a part of a rebellion and the Marquis De Sade who at the time was imprisoned for his writings would have supported any type of rebellion against tyrants of religious or government dictatorship.
This is the very idea that Creativity is stifled by either a religious or tyrannical dictator proves that when in creation of art one must be able to find inspiration in the worst places in time. The Marquis De Sade was a writer who knew what he was writing about. The very problem between survival in beliefs such as being good and poor or having sex and living is evident in Justine. The abuse of power is seen in 120 Days of Sodom. The problem is that corporations or religious affiliates or regular people can take metaphor and react violently and aggressively attack either the work or the man behind them. Creativity is the very nature of disobedience against the willful act of an oppressor is everything the Marquis stood for. Yes he wrote stories but should a man like De Sade should be punished for his creative acts of free speech but in some respect the creative act is a dangerous notion to people who do not see a metaphor as a metaphor.
If the Catholic church hated De Sades writing they should have discussed his ideas and not imprisoning him without even a detail of what makes his ideas wrong or at least incredulous. If its a crime to ridicule in writing art social media posts a public figure corporation or a celebrity its becoming a time when society has forgotten what makes a free society free again. America in its finality wants money it must accept censorship as the binding force for attaining funds from China and the government under its strict censorship policy.
Art must never be dictated by a foreign government or religious group on what an individual can say or not. The very bedrock of creativity and the way an artist think cannot bend to the will of status quo or mob mentality. Faces and names change but speech can be indoctrinated to mean many multiple meanings. Its creativity and a lack of impulse that makes the Marquiss story an interesting problem.
If Creativity cannot be impulsive or say the things that we want to say art is thus censored and has lost its meaning. Creativity is the bedrock of a free society and if filmmakers artists writers are being harassed for their creative acts it only breeds corruption and rot in societys speech. If Creativity is inhibited regulated or even the artists are violently attacked for it this is a new war we are fighting. Anti-intellectualism is not a political tool its a sign of arrogance and stupidity.
Its not producing a work of art. Critique and Impulse never run in the same circle as they are incongruent with each other. Critiquing reviewing is not making art until someone who is critiquing art actually has to produce a piece of art that others can critique themselves. Creativity and Anti-intellectualism sometimes can create what most others tend not to think is true but is. Thats why works of art are difficult to understand. Human beings requires an impulse or empathy to understand someone who is truly different. Impulse and empathy are one in the same. Creativity is bound between them.
This war is now the problem of what we face in society. Nobody wants to commit to such a response of knowing what the problem is and the deception of Anti-Intellectualism. Yes its great to like fart jokes and laugh at South Park. Its not like there is nobody out there who doesnt like South Park or laugh at bad jokes. Thats not the point. Art is about knowing that you are giving into someone elses view and nobody wants to do that anymore. The will to create what they know in the hydra headed snake that leers over us but Creativity is a hard issue to talk about without empathy.
Empathy is what allows us to continue forward as though they know what has already seen what they notice in the future as though others look forward in the brittle escape of man bound by the energy of what makes the world a simple gesture as they did continue forward into the last operation involved. It sounds like we are entering a war zone but the problem is the war is changing all the time. Meanings get changed and the enemies are always at the gate. Creativity must be willing to fight for what they mean and probe the mind at all cost. Giving in will make sure that no longer the problem of holding out on such a will might yet change the outcome knowing what clearly looks in the same moment of circling those who have seen what they know in the humid taste of following the same moment of following what Art truly means. The Rugged Individualism is a part of it as well.
Art must be different in order to be a part of the authors cannon of literature photos or comic. It must come from the natural promise of looking back at what it must know in the same problem that they have once yet committed such perception in those who have seen the energy of what completely looks as though the problem might yet infuse the bottom of the single handed artistic measure as those who have seen what creates the same problem of those who have searched for what betrayed those who have seen what they see and no matter the promise of how much promise is the best looking deception of how one or the other might yet look at the heavy incumbent as the touch of reminders seek what they know as the touch of anachronistic emulsion is the only chance of knowing what looks forever unabashed as the romance of life is often those who have not yet seen what they know ahead.
Creativity is the best answer to real world violence. Creativity and impulse requires one thing for the people who are left with nothing: freedom to think and behave and be as violent as you want to be. Its okay to write things down in a book because you have the freedom to use it and never once allow yourself to become the person you dont want to be. Writing has helped me figure out all the things that are wrong with life and put it into a story format. You dont have to be famous to write but now with social media all you need is a following. Start your own following and always have an impulse to write. Just make sure you are always ready to be yourself at all cost.
(picture source: )
There is a saying that you must learn from a teacher to become better at what you are. I did that through a few phases of my life. If creativity is meant to come from a teacher it wasnt a teacher in school or a book that inspired me but both of them. Its the problem of having so many influences that you dont analyze and find what makes you worthy than what you are copying. Copying plagiarism is anathema to a person like myself that finds creativity the bedrock of my artistic endeavors. Its a philosophy and a lifelong message I have longed to live in every fiber of my being. I know that not every artist tends to live the life they want in order to feel artistic. Many artists such as novelists even when popular do speaking gigs and interviews about books or what the current state of politics is. Politics is anathema for the creative soul. If you love everyone fine then love everyone. Fuck horses if you love them so much but a horse cannot be creative. A horses creative aspect is to procreate thats it.
It just is acting out its natural DNA that it was assigned by its genetics. Yes there are stories about horses but they have more to do with how we interpret them. Its a promising idea to want to know what animals think but even Animal Farm George Orwell represented the worst of what humans could do to each other so did animals. Creativity is a cycle that moves in underground cults never in mainstream media. The press wishes to be free so it can speak its opinion but when the business of free speech" means doxing people for an opinion then it means something different. Creativity in its essence must come from a teacher that has the students best interest at heart. Since creativity must also come from studying classic work of literature its the artists job to make his own stamp in the creative world but no longer is the single perception of life one to just study and never inhabit the creative toils.
Being creative isnt talking about it either. Talking about creativity only means you have not put in the good work to be able to express it on paper or whatever medium you are choosing to discuss your ideas on. A problem with creativity is that if it does come from a teacher the students wants to appeal to the teacher. A clear reciprocity of the will is not like those who have already changed their mind in order to please the teacher but its not the teacher that must be pleased but the student who capitulates their love and affection for the mastery of the craft. The craft must come from extra circular studies that is not solely inspired from the teacher. Its a reasonable effort to want to please the teacher but I was always one to buck trends and make sure that my own voice was heard over the assignment. Maybe this pissed off my teachers but I felt invincible to want to challenge my teachers which was the opposite of pure satisfaction.
I mostly received middle to bad grades because I didnt follow their assignment. I found it easier to piss in the eye than take it up the ass. It was not my decision to do this but a will far beyond my superiors and teachers. I know that I was merely fighting an uphill battle but I had not yet found the confidence to do the work and be satisfied with the work they were giving me. Teaching is about learning to subjugate the will and find the essence of looking at the lost dimensions until the single presence looks back into the sky and we all look at ourselves in the way we should. From a distance.
A moment must come first and then the critique. What teachers taught me is that you must allow yourself to be the person you want but also back up what you say in a debate. What the clear promise of showing all your sources is guiding your rationale. It was merely the chance to become the person you see in this article. In this article I am handsome ripped women swooning over my throne but the real world look is rather off kilter. The essence of holding too much power in a work of art is knowing that you must achieve perfection even if people dont see it as perfection. If a review of my novel says Its complicated" you have done a good thing.
If you have pissed the establishment off you have done the best work you could do. Yes while it may not look good you are only studying it in depth. Sometimes being called complicated" is like untucking a shirt out of your pants. It shows you have skill and determination to treat the audience with respect and let them see that you arent afraid of taking risks. Thats Impulse.
The problem with impulse is that sometimes its not always the same thing that will make us seem approachable. Its creative impulse that can make a hot item the next best thing to crowdfund. The honesty of what makes creativity inspiring is that while creativity is the essence of knowing the sheer impulse beyond what makes your own words resonate with people. Its the distinct fervor of the individual that makes Creativity soar. Sometimes it doesnt have to do with public opinion. Public opinion is merely one aspect of Creativity. The Impulse is that while something may sound astute might not yet become the same problem they know would always search outward in the same breath. Searching outward is not where creativity comes from. The essence of creativity is knowing that you thought up what you believe and didnt come from someone else.
All I see online is that people repost news articles but its not an original idea. It makes the world seem as close minded as we can be. We have to hear the continued perception of our inner voice. The inner voice is a part of impulse and creativity. Inner voices allow us to speak what we really feel and exterior voices are just as explanatory as he said she said" and no matter what people find in the same absolute perfection of knowing that no matter the problem at hand inner voices and exterior voices meet at the creative impulse. Creativity is very fascinating. It means you must use metaphor to explain what really hides within you. Its not hiding if its creative.
The moment creativity meets an art form real world violence is averted. The outcome is that no more the same problems that are met with creativity is where the world meets together when art and words meet. If one thinks they are merely regurgitating what they hear will make them original thats why the arts has become less enthralling as of late. The problem with the arts right now is that it must take an anti-republican stance that only makes the world unbearable and all art meaningless. Its a reason why most of the world has abandoned movies and the ones they go see are not going to make the critics happy. When critical consensus meets public opinion its very rarely that they often do meet at the same time. While Lord of the Rings are the best films that one can make the critics loved them and the audience did as well.
Thats a rare occasion and last of a dying breed that creativity helps within the same momentum. The clear destruction of those who have forgotten what it means to be creative are often disgruntled at the way society is e.g. modern leftism. The pure application of knowing what makes something creative is why criticism is disdained by the public at large. Creativity should and always be statements that no longer look at the responsible momentum as those who yet speak the same message. Its a responsible effort to make sure that Creativity must be balanced with the healthy dose of two opinions that equal up two halves of society i.e. a character who hates immigrants versus an immigrant who helps the character see that hes just the same as the character who hates immigrants.
Its the polarization of creativity that makes the world a happier place. Its Creativity that can get people into trouble sometimes. Creativity should and largely get people into trouble. If Salman Rushdie is an example he must be stated as the righteous heir to creativity since Calvino. Pissing off the leader of Iran comes almost as a mistake since there are so many other offensive works of literature that makes Creativity dangerous to Islam is that Salman Rushdie was unapologetic in his approach to the way Muhammed was projected in his work The Satanic Verses. Creativity means that by offense its largely misunderstood.
Misunderstood Creativity is what makes up most offensive art. If Jackson Pollack pisses you off its probably because you are a pissed off artist that doesnt see the value in his work. This is what makes Creativity misunderstood. Misunderstanding is a part of what makes humans effortlessly conducive to terrorism. As George Carlin said Israelis are called freedom fighters while the Arabs are called terrorists." Its a part of the cycle of being creative. People have different names for things.
Being misunderstood is a part of what we think is the basic understanding that most human beings must come to appreciate. People are different by default and should we all agree on the same idea is preposterous. Being Creative and misunderstood comes back to critics who think they see a problem when the text was written to be read that way to begin with. If we are to put William Burroughs and Ginsberg up to puritanical standards of the left today who dont appreciate creativity they would be run out of the business. I guess some people would love the idea of being a champion of freedom of speech until their bank accounts and money start drying up and they are ostracized from society.
But creativity must be able to stand both against the masses and those who would destroy the art. In Ecce Homo Nietzsche describes from Zarusthra is that whoever wants to become a creator in good or evil must first be a destroyer and dismantle values. Therefore the greatest evil is part of the greatest goodness; but this is being creative" (Nietzsche Frederick. Ecce Homo. P. 132).
The problem of being creative is that you must either willingly or not destroy what you mean to create but most of all the problem is neither the essence of good or evil but you must be an iconoclast that destroys ideas and must be willing to do both good and evil in essential creativity. The understanding of creativity is that there can always be a villain hero or neither. Sometimes art can be represented as humans living as they always do but Creativity is also becoming a part of the individual. The Individual must become the Creative gust of wind that inspires someone to become a hero or a villain. Sometimes its characters who live their life the way they want that helps creativity foster a new age in the digital world. But maybe we are looking at this too closely?
Whether good or evil is represented creativity must be willing to stand up to criticism on both sides of the field. The problem with associating the creative with one who stands up for speech related arguments is what makes the world a safer place. The Creative impulse must stand up for whats right even in the face of danger. Nietzsche would argue this would be the case against religion but being creative is breaking all the rules in order to be free of what we used to believe.
Whether by force or rendition Creativity must blossom to the foremost bubble of thoughts who have created such a place in the highest regard of Creative impulse. The problem is that no one wants to stand up for the creative act that we would rather nullify those sensations and it will come out against people who think differently. Those are people to stay away from. They think they have good ideas but they are merely just a slave to the idea of staying true to their own beliefs. The Creative Impulse must be at the height of superiority but also remember where he must stay in order to reflect the necessary damage of not only operating at the highest qualm but the dove who speaks into the ear that no one else hears. Doves devils angels all have come to the same appropriate measure of Creative Impulse. All must learn their own way and break through the outer shell where the depth of knowing such a will power forgets itself in the way others tend to think.
Move in both goodness and evil because in the Creative Impulse we are the very essence of what makes Creativity move. Creativity is useless in the same way others tend to think it might benefit them. It would get them through mind numbing jobs if they didnt have a guilty conscience over not writing. A writer must write even if being poor is the fate of most creative people. Its unfair but the best are often overlooked until they are dead. But also to bring back the German Philosopher Nietzsche in Ecce Homo You pay dearly to be immortal; you have to die several times during your lifetime." (108).
No one likes this but there is another essence to Creativity. The Deceptive Inferior mindset. Deception is knowing that artists are lying. The reality of those who have yet fostered a stable connection is those who have seen the best look as they fostered the will to create itself in the same honor of will power but the experience of knowing what silences those who have seen what the stable form of creativity takes it must always be missing something. Perfection is what is called Mary Sue" and no matter what people say those characters are not human beings. Mary Sues are the exemplary female woman that doesnt exist. If its not feminine in any way that people can relate to it its a Mary Sue.
The Deceptive Inferior mindset is that problems always occur but sometimes from within. Its the anima that must meet the males status of what makes them look as though they sit as close as they do to the edge of a story. Knowing this is the same as those who never once see themselves in the character. Men need a woman to take up the feminine cycle of the relationship. A problem of those who have yet to experience a skill to follow such a will to attest the same might yet consciously look forever in the same moment of artistic endeavor. Mary Sues are not the characters that neither men or females relate to. Problems that create what they know in the hope that neither the essence of creating such a power in the hope that each might yet infuse the same models of ideology over aesthetic. Nietzsche would have probably hated the way ideology has taken over aesthetic and now there is no truer moment than today when we look at what has created itself. Captain Marvel is the clear example of what makes itself a parody of chosen implications of what writers think they can give women but it merely only turns them in to an SJW writer with no real aesthetic to turn to.
Aesthetics is what makes the Deceptive Inferior mindset intriguing. Perfection is only better in heros who have no other choice but to fight evil because they have to" and have no real other motive. Deceptive inferior mindset can be seen in what makes the clear introspective nature. What Mary Sue characters cant do is find a multiple choice way of telling a story as one must be subjective in finding the element of creativity authentic as possible. Authentic interpretations are apparat of the Deceptive Inferior mindset.
It shows that while the promise of knowing the simpler justification of a character one must be able to avoid the higher road of storytelling. Sometimes the characters must get dirty and be dirty to know that they are still in fact a part of the world. A weakness is what makes a character relatable in the hands of an authentic creative person. An unreliable narrator is also attributed to the Deceptive Inferior mindset.
The perception of what makes the understanding closely behave as those who have seen what makes itself a true inspiration to behold. Mary Sue characters do not have imperfections. They are boring and they offer nothing of themselves. The Deceptive Inferior mindset is that nothing is off the table. Each tableau must be investigated to show what the inspiration of how much one can create a personifying gesture of those who have seen what they know in the basic understanding of how much a person can move backwards in order to move forwards. A notion of how much a simpler motivation in the Deceptive Inferior mindset creates a distance of how much one can relate to the work through an understanding of how much a character can become a part of the psyche. The writer must also see the character as a part of the psyche in order to find a strong promise of the Deceptive inferior mindset.
The problem is when weak writers try to find problems they try to answer them and answering problems have no real solution but more problems on top of them. Guessing is still the inspiration of knowing what clearly follows the problem of knowing the same power might yet inspire those who have seen a true horror to put it down into words and sink into the floor and know that the true questions always lead to more questions and answers are merely just a last promise of infinite boredom.
Creativity means you must plunge into the darkness and however consciously looking like the problem you must forget polite manners. Only a prudish person looks down on cursing. Another Mary Sue or a male feminist would say something like that. Its the conscious effort of knowing that creativity is something that you cant control either. Thriller writers often plan out their work but planning it out is another version of a rough draft. True works of art cant be planned out as a true master story teller knows all of it must come from a painful wound. The creation of the Mary Sue is what makes true writers of intelligence just shake their head or smh as the young say.
What becomes of a Mary Sue is a part of a cultural moment that perceptively look at one another and dont see anybody different. Creative people should hate the Mary Sue and reject it at all cost. The problem of knowing the power of weakness is that you can create endearing and powerful characters within them. Cinematic examples are Terminators Sarah Connor Ellen Ripley from Alien and Alita from Alita Battle Angel. Its those characters that show the experience of what simply look together in the same vision of what is a weak character who turns strong but retains feminine qualities. A problem of knowing that weakness is a part of the human psyche must come to the same position they always do is that turning a weakness into a strength knowingly decides what the promise of simpler thoughts of imperfections are still showing how someone might become strong out of a desperate situation. The perception of how strength and quality are those who have yet followed some impression of near quixotic relationships. Relationships are also a part of the Creative impulse. Dante Alighieri descends into hell for Beatrice in the Inferno.
He faints but its his weakness that we find admirable. Feminist would probably argue a story where the Inferno is told from Beatrices point of view but this is the reason why most leftists cant grasp the art of storytelling anymore. The perception of the female is what makes the connection between both the male Anima and the opportunity of those who have seen what the world can make out of troubling perspectives.
Its Beatrices death that motivates Dante to rescue her from hell but its the reason why most of the wisdom given to us in creativity is the impulse to create something that will last throughout the ages. Women characters have always been a sign of wisdom and fertility in the age of cinema and in art but the perception of all perfect characters with no flaws is not good storytelling. Its the reason why most movies today are often met horribly by the audience. Its not the growing male audience in comics literature etc that makes female characters interesting but they have to be genuine. Both Ellen Ripley and Sarah Conner are genuine characters that are believable.
Yes believable. Believable characters dont exist in the Mary Sue archetypes. They are the reason why most cinema and art fail and most artists never see the way out of a tunnel vision career. Art is meant to be subjective turning the eye away from the masses concerns and onto the individual. Rugged Individualism sounds like a phrase out of the American West. Its the determination of characters who seek a refuge from the wilderness of society and become people of sound mind body and character. Individualism and the characters who are individuals are the reason why most art and literature stands the test of time. The Terminator Alita Alien and The Inferno all are about individuals coming to find the strength of courage that most other people who tend to stay in groups think they can make it out of rough scenarios. Rugged Individualism comes from a place of courage and even in the old West this proved to be true. Westerns and sci-fi share a common theme but what about all around?
Its the appearance of being tough over looking tough. Creative impulse must also be embedded within Rugged Individualism. The problem of art is that it no longer seems to look as if the Individual matters. Creativity must come from a deep raw character that holds itself among the entire perfect connection of those who have seen what may come to finalize the weapon of Rugged Individualism.
Creativity must come from within and its why so many characters must have obstacles in order to face them. Its the result of knowing the perception of how much a character can grow from being nave to smart and rugged. The clarity of Rugged Individualism is the same opportunity of finding what makes a central character strong enough to fight their way out of tough scenarios. Moby Dick is a good example. Ishmael is the only character left to survive after Ahab and the whale die in a brutal show at the end but its obsession that remains within Ahab. His hatred against the whale is the counterbalance to Ishmael who seems more interested in just making a living.
The notion that Ishmael lives at the end is that his lack of obsession makes him a cause for how one can survive at the end of a long journey swept up on the high seas and knowing that Rugged Individualism is how most characters live at the end of a horrifying journey. The idea that no longer looks at what makes the sign over the novel OBVIOUS" makes us know that Creative impulse is the way that most artist give us such wisdom and knowledge through story and happy enough to remain an individual in the overall arc of life. But Creativity must retain that individualism or the idea that people are only designed to be fated by destiny cannot truly overcome their destiny.
The experience of destiny is that no character can have a fate that offers them a happy ending. Each Greek myth blatantly as Oedipus knows that without some key information he will only lead to his destruction by killing his father and marrying his mother because he never met them in the first place and also the Oracle warned his father that it would happen if he didnt get rid of the child showing that Oracles will often try to interfere with the world of the characters.
Yes while this isnt a new example this is an idea where individualism is thwarted by the Oracles who know what is about to happen in the world and problems that arise out of Greek tragedies are the impotence of how a story can be controlled from the very beginning. Its not like there is a pattern of how Individualism is always thwarted by Deus Ex Machinas where the hero needs the help of the Gods to push him towards his goal but the problem of the universe interfering with the Individual has always been a problem with most books concerning that meaning of fate and how a character without powers can fight their way on their own. The instance of knowing such problems are best understood by the root of the inner conflict is also what makes Greek Tragedies an example as how most characters are given a free pass in order to achieve their quest. Its the unknowing of Oedipus who destroys himself at the end that makes the world of Oedipus resonates to today.
The problem of knowing what fate holds for us is a nightmare and creativity should always hold certain things from the characters even if the audience knows it when they read it. The destination is what most other perfections are just as close to the same identity of the unknown and no matter the problems associated with the journey the end of Oedipus proved that it was scripted from the beginning and sometimes a mystery that is truly genuine is what make the reader contemplate the idea that we are all merely just moved toward destinys grasp. The imminent problem of knowing such a wisdom must never be known to the character and whether the problem is merely one associated by the fate of gentle meanderings its the common misconception that knowing will make characters happier.
Even then the decision to know is the same as falling short of destiny. It was Oedipuss destiny to kill his father and marry his mother because it was his destiny. Individualism matters little in Greek Mythology but Rugged Individualism is what makes the journey meaningful. The instance of how a journey can destroy one in the end is what most characters and people have to live with. Happy endings are few and far between and great sacrifices are meant in order to find the ending meaningful. A dark tale doesnt mean it always meant to reflect the person reading it but maybe help them understand some painful moment in their life. If we dont question things we are merely fated to live by what fate will merely give us.
Creativity and Impulse are still motions. Psychological depth is what will help characters become better or worse people today. What most Creatives tend to think is that novels are about good people. Being good doesnt make you a good person. It might help with pleasant conversations. Its a problem when Creativity must deal with only being good but they show how bland they are and they learn nothing from their experiences on the page. Those used to be called static characters but the idea that this is the new norm is what makes it disturbing. Being friendly only yields one result. Yes being good doesnt make you bad or evil but boring. Boring characters are meant to help the main character hold such persuasion in the way others look at themselves.
The perception of goodness is a stilting problem in the way most other works of art tend to act towards. Its conflict that makes a hero become a villain or a villain turn into a hero. The compromise is that the story must retain the balance between creative impulse and the problems that they must figure out. Decisions in art must remain fluid and impulsive but yield the ingenious notion that no longer ascribes the character in simple terms. Psychological depth must also prove that impulsiveness guided by the design of natural causes proves what makes psychological depth disturbing. Sometimes its a villain that can make people the question of their safety but also if they share some qualities with them. The outcome in the hands of a great artist know that they have already come into existence as the same response to what a good person should do but they have already reminded themselves what they must not do in order to survive.
Being afraid of breaking the law is also a reminder that this is not going to stop people from committing crimes. Its usually the little details of what can drive people to cause crimes to happen. People are not born evil but society can turn a good person into a villain overnight. Recent examples of this is Todd Philips Joker (2019). Creative Impulse must let creative people explore the psychological dysfunction that will allow them to be creative and explore what their real feelings hold. Just because art must dwell in darkness its that psychological depth that makes the lonely person feel less alone. The outcome is that while the problem is not only mischaracterized but its not seen as good if it doesnt follow PC standards. Its the problem of fake inclusivity" that doesnt allow art to flourish but its the opposite of acceptance. Its a problem of trying to make art a safe space without provocation.
Making things safe doesnt mean its how personal growth will happen. Its a conscious effort to remain blind to the facts of society but when often or not art must be constrained to invisible inclusivity" that makes the deception of growth meaningless. Progressivism only means one must act well in society but then do things in private the same way as always. If you havent made one mistake in your life you havent grown at all. Thats what makes people merely static and they dont realize it until they have pushed everyone away with their ideals but they are wandering why am I alone?" and why doesnt art behave the way I do?" Answer: Art is not supposed to behave in the way most people interact with people. Messed up people create art not good people.
But the problem is that psychological depth must provoke and entertain and destroying psychological depth for happy thoughts" isnt art and should not be treated as a medium for progressive" false behavior. The deception of acting nice but then turning on people for little things is what makes the world far less bearable. Its why art must remain a dejected art form which is why art has always dealt with depression anxiety and most of all a problem merely reductive in the same way that art must progress is a false lie being taught at universities. PC behavior makes one more entrenched in villainy which has nothing to do with progressive behavior at all. Being free from progressive thoughts may help art and what people continue to think is good art. Comedy which should be allowed to talk freely in Creativity and impulse is what makes the world bearable.
Comedic Intrusion is the world that allows such permission to be granted. Laughter at an enemy proves you have control over them. Never once think that the conversation that takes place is supposed to be serious or lacking what they prove as real. In comedy everything is a force of creative impulse. The problem of having to design comedy to work for a scripted reaction will only prove meaningless to the world watching art. Marvel movies only know that comedy would kill them in the end and this proved well with Endgame (2019) that the greatest ally humor was their weakest link.
Comedians prove that with each joke they are taking shots at people because comedy must be offensive in order to provoke a reaction. Comedy written from a progressive" or inclusive" demeanor only proves that nothing is funny and jokes cannot be made for the sake of an audience that doesnt care about their art. Progressive comedy has always been regressive in nature. Laughter can kill any serious situation. Life and death can prove to be funny when in the hands of a master. In Salo or the 120 Days of Sodom both deceptively move the situation the Castle (in the novel) and World War 2 Italy (movie) remain as promising to the debate over what can make Art great while exploring the psychological disparity of evil and what makes people good or not. There is no problem with either works of Art.
Except when a society cant handle the severity of the text or film and can misinterpret metaphors for real life. It cost Paolo Pasolini his life after an enraged movie goer was so mad about the movie he shot and killed the director for making the film. Its frightening when filmmakers and novelists cant be protected for the art they make but what would the world have been like without the Marquis or Pasolini? The very essence of Marquis De Sades speech was seen as a threat to public society. The problem is someone mistook his blasphemes as literal and not metaphorical. What China is doing in 2019 to its citizens is what the Catholic Church did in the time of the Marquiss writing. If a writer is censored by either a government or religious affiliation they are a part of a rebellion and the Marquis De Sade who at the time was imprisoned for his writings would have supported any type of rebellion against tyrants of religious or government dictatorship.
This is the very idea that Creativity is stifled by either a religious or tyrannical dictator proves that when in creation of art one must be able to find inspiration in the worst places in time. The Marquis De Sade was a writer who knew what he was writing about. The very problem between survival in beliefs such as being good and poor or having sex and living is evident in Justine. The abuse of power is seen in 120 Days of Sodom. The problem is that corporations or religious affiliates or regular people can take metaphor and react violently and aggressively attack either the work or the man behind them. Creativity is the very nature of disobedience against the willful act of an oppressor is everything the Marquis stood for. Yes he wrote stories but should a man like De Sade should be punished for his creative acts of free speech but in some respect the creative act is a dangerous notion to people who do not see a metaphor as a metaphor.
If the Catholic church hated De Sades writing they should have discussed his ideas and not imprisoning him without even a detail of what makes his ideas wrong or at least incredulous. If its a crime to ridicule in writing art social media posts a public figure corporation or a celebrity its becoming a time when society has forgotten what makes a free society free again. America in its finality wants money it must accept censorship as the binding force for attaining funds from China and the government under its strict censorship policy.
Art must never be dictated by a foreign government or religious group on what an individual can say or not. The very bedrock of creativity and the way an artist think cannot bend to the will of status quo or mob mentality. Faces and names change but speech can be indoctrinated to mean many multiple meanings. Its creativity and a lack of impulse that makes the Marquiss story an interesting problem.
If Creativity cannot be impulsive or say the things that we want to say art is thus censored and has lost its meaning. Creativity is the bedrock of a free society and if filmmakers artists writers are being harassed for their creative acts it only breeds corruption and rot in societys speech. If Creativity is inhibited regulated or even the artists are violently attacked for it this is a new war we are fighting. Anti-intellectualism is not a political tool its a sign of arrogance and stupidity.
Its not producing a work of art. Critique and Impulse never run in the same circle as they are incongruent with each other. Critiquing reviewing is not making art until someone who is critiquing art actually has to produce a piece of art that others can critique themselves. Creativity and Anti-intellectualism sometimes can create what most others tend not to think is true but is. Thats why works of art are difficult to understand. Human beings requires an impulse or empathy to understand someone who is truly different. Impulse and empathy are one in the same. Creativity is bound between them.
This war is now the problem of what we face in society. Nobody wants to commit to such a response of knowing what the problem is and the deception of Anti-Intellectualism. Yes its great to like fart jokes and laugh at South Park. Its not like there is nobody out there who doesnt like South Park or laugh at bad jokes. Thats not the point. Art is about knowing that you are giving into someone elses view and nobody wants to do that anymore. The will to create what they know in the hydra headed snake that leers over us but Creativity is a hard issue to talk about without empathy.
Empathy is what allows us to continue forward as though they know what has already seen what they notice in the future as though others look forward in the brittle escape of man bound by the energy of what makes the world a simple gesture as they did continue forward into the last operation involved. It sounds like we are entering a war zone but the problem is the war is changing all the time. Meanings get changed and the enemies are always at the gate. Creativity must be willing to fight for what they mean and probe the mind at all cost. Giving in will make sure that no longer the problem of holding out on such a will might yet change the outcome knowing what clearly looks in the same moment of circling those who have seen what they know in the humid taste of following the same moment of following what Art truly means. The Rugged Individualism is a part of it as well.
Art must be different in order to be a part of the authors cannon of literature photos or comic. It must come from the natural promise of looking back at what it must know in the same problem that they have once yet committed such perception in those who have seen the energy of what completely looks as though the problem might yet infuse the bottom of the single handed artistic measure as those who have seen what creates the same problem of those who have searched for what betrayed those who have seen what they see and no matter the promise of how much promise is the best looking deception of how one or the other might yet look at the heavy incumbent as the touch of reminders seek what they know as the touch of anachronistic emulsion is the only chance of knowing what looks forever unabashed as the romance of life is often those who have not yet seen what they know ahead.
Creativity is the best answer to real world violence. Creativity and impulse requires one thing for the people who are left with nothing: freedom to think and behave and be as violent as you want to be. Its okay to write things down in a book because you have the freedom to use it and never once allow yourself to become the person you dont want to be. Writing has helped me figure out all the things that are wrong with life and put it into a story format. You dont have to be famous to write but now with social media all you need is a following. Start your own following and always have an impulse to write. Just make sure you are always ready to be yourself at all cost.