I think its time to admit to everyone what abortion is really about. Sure, on the surface you can say right to choose, her body her choice, etc; but when you have women discussing the power of their sexual anatomy then you really understand what its all about. It was about two things really. Number One, it was about sexual liberation for women and/or the so-called rights of women to be able to have sexual relationships without the worries of carrying and baring a child (certain men love this too and one of them was responsible for making abortion legal). Most abortions done to this day are flat out done out of convenance, and the likes of Ilyse Hogue and Jill Filipovic confirmed this when they admit that abortion is about having sex without procreation. Number Two, abortion was also about advancing the population control agenda which has always advocated murder of those who can’t fit the criteria of the social engineers of the moment.
The zeitgeist is no different than Lucifer, when he either took the form of a snake and/or possessed it in order to convince a woman named Eve that she would be like God. Adam apparently was either careless or trusted Eve just a little too much, and so the story goes. Child Sacrifice has become the forbidden fruit over the years, but it became more personal when surgical abortion and later birth control pills (which some say do induce an abortion) came into play. Make no mistake, abortion is a big power play, and certain women feel that being able to end a pregnancy coupled with murdering a preborn child (no matter how its candy coded) makes them empowered if not powerful.
The current monkey wrench to challenge Roe vs. Wade (if not Doe vs. Bolton which is lesser known) is the state of Mississippi. That respected state passed an abortion law that would prohibit abortions after the 15th week of pregnancy. As always, the Pro-Aborts fought and won at the lower courts, but this case is yet among the handful that the Supreme Court of the United States wanted to hear. The Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) whose founders were pro-abortion feminists demanded that then President Trump not to replace their girl Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with someone they feel they could not control and/or by sympathetic to their cause. They failed of course and now Amy Coney Barrett could very well challenge the status quo regarding abortion in America since 1973. If Barack Obama had the Senate in his final year in office, Merrick Garland would have been able to tilt the court more to the left instead of becoming Biden’s Attorney General. Now FFRF and the left want to pack the court in hopes of keeping preborn baby murder legal.
On the other hand, there are those on the Pro-Life side who are skeptical and they should be. Barrett could help usher in a hallow victory or no victory at all, and the march towards the goal of Abortion on Demand no questions asked (including forcing the taxpayers to pay for certain abortions) continues. Steve Deace said it best on his social sites; "One of two defining moments will occur with SCOTUS accepting first real challenge to Roe in 30 years. Either we’re about to see the biggest #ProLife win in the history of the movement, or the conservative legal movement as we’ve known it will implode."
Deace is right, for those are in involved in Pro-Life activism as well as in the abortion abolition movement will have to find other ways to curb if not recriminalization abortion. But the takeaway regarding this case is this. Do women have the right and the power to kill the baby growing in the womb? For so long, women felt that the likes of Planned Parenthood were empowering the fair sex, and like Adam so many men just buckled down and let the women speak on their behalf. The consequences imposed by these wicked women past and present are devastating. The justices in the 1973 cases of Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton were compromised big time thanks to the women who were truly family in the lives Justice Potter Stewart and Justice Harry Blackmun. They had to eat the forbidden fruit because their women (wives and daughters) already partaken in the deadly fruit being produced by Planned Parenthood. Actually, if these justices honestly feared God, they would knock out the fruit out the hands of their women and put them in place, telling them why abortion is wrong and that it really hurts women if not the child. Now that could have had big consequences for these justices with likely tongue lashing from their women, but anyway if they did that, that would be men doing what they were supposed to do. Protect their families, protect innocent live in America, if not fear God.
So why fight against abortion when so many women claim to support it? Well, many of us (men and women) do strongly believe that the human race, especially the preborn child was created in the image of God himself (Genesis 1:26–28, Psalm 139:13-14). As such, we honor God by protecting that life as soon conception has taken place. Why did Lawrence Lader (an Atheist) attack the Roman Catholic Church with a passion? Why does FFRF and other Big A Atheists want to cleanse statements of Faith from the public square and government expect their own? The more children that accept the worldview of these so-called Freethinkers, the more people will advance and/or allow for preborn baby murder to continue legally…and then some. Worldview indeed does matter, and certain worldviews do come into conflict with each other.
Lawrence Lader was eventually called by Betty Friedan, the father of the abortion movement. Lader eventually nudged Friedan and many women of the time to his thinking. Lader was not a supporter of the feminist movement of the day, but rather his passion was population control, and good golly Miss Molly abortion was going to play a big role forwarding the cause. After all, with abortion made legal if people don’t do what is good for “Mother Earth,” then we shall force them to limit their families to one or two children and make them abort the rest. This really does fly in the face of God’s command to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:28), but he don’t care. Lader’s book on “Abortion” in 1966 was all that SCOTUS needed in decided Roe v. Wade, and after that book, Lader wrote a book on population control called “Breeding Ourselves to Death.” After abortion was made legal by the highest court, Lader then wrote a follow-up to his 1966 book titled “Abortion II: Making the Revolution.” Lader was mentored by Margaret Sanger herself and should have been proud of what Lader had done. Oh, and Lader did help make RU-486 legal…eventually. Lader was truly an evil man.
Margaret Sanger is hailed as a champion for women and reproductive freedom, but what is downplayed is the fact that she was a Marxist Anarchist. When women speak of their reproductive parts in any way, they are no different than Sanger. Like Sanger they hate their natural and biological role of creating and barring children, if not spending nine-month periods cranking out “brats.” They desire be something more they say. But Sanger lead the way in advocating for the right of women to have “unlimited sexual gratification without the burden of unwanted children.” She also thumbed her nose at the marriage institution; “The marriage bed is the most degenerative influence in the social order.” That from a woman who admits that she is a rotten mother if not someone who hated her own children and children altogether. Dare I say that Sanger was the evilest woman of the 20th Century.
FFRF has highlighted many Marxists who claimed to be and were Freethinkers and Atheists, including Karl Marx, Saul Alinsky, Howard Zinn along with some our founders. I agree that Thomas Jefferson was a deist, but he was not a advocate for statism like so many modern-day so-called Freethinkers are. Yes, our U.S. Constitution is secular but it also recognizes the need for Faith and Religion and those very things to hold people accountable if you’re not going to have an earthy King (which God gave when his people asked for one). We just don’t have a state church, and nor do I want one. Thank goodness we still have some Freedom of Speech. FFRF founder the late Anne Nicol Gaylor is right when she says that “religion” is a threat to so-called women’s rights (i.e. the right to kill the preborn in womb/abortion on demand), because unlike Gaylor or her daughter (Annie Laurie) and son in law (Dan Barker), we don’t call the killing of the preborn like they do “a blessing.” We don’t view it as empowering women, but for likes of the Gaylor, that kind power for women is a blessing because in the long run…its only about Me, Myself, and I…or your eventually hatred of the human race and/or your own existence…but yet, you still want to control the human race like God himself. Truly it does go back to Eve’s choice to rebel against God. God commands to protect the lives of the innocent, while executing the lives of those who have murdered the innocent. Yet these same Marxists, Freethinkers, and Atheists prefer to allow murderers to live (even if they are “caged” for the rest of lives) while allowing for the murder of the preborn and elderly who are among the innocent.
I am not holding my breath hoping that Roe v. Wade is overturned, but if it does finally happen in my lifetime, we among those who Fear God and/or understand that life is sacred as well as finite…we shall take action. That action will declare that NO ONE can never EVER take God’s place (including Nature’s God), regarding who lives and dies. Yes, we shall do what we can to outlaw and recriminalize abortion. It’s no right, it’s a crime against the innocent. That is not evil. Now what was pushed by the Laders, Sangers, and the Barker-Gaylors…THAT’S EVIL!
As of this writing the abortion clock is nearing 63 million abortion since Roe v. Wade.
Please visit my social sites on Facebook and Parler. Email me at [email protected].