Benedict Obamas Invasion of America

If millions of soldiers from south of the border were flooding our nation for the purposes of colonizing our land we would easily recognize the threat. And if some amongst us were aiding and abetting this invasion purposely lowering border security to facilitate it wed know what to call them. And wed know how they should be dealt with. This comes to mind when considering the flood of humanity that does continually pour across our border a phenomenon whose most recent manifestation is the childrens crusade (which includes many teens some of whom are gang members) currently in the news. Oh the people trespassing on our land arent wearing uniforms; they arent wielding cold steel. But this isnt always necessary. As Muammar Gaddafi once pointed out some invasions are prosecuted without sword without gun without conquest." We dont need terrorists; we dont need homicide bombers" he said. The 50 plus million Muslims in Europe will turn it into the Muslim Continent within a few decades." Of course in the waning West we call this diversity" and demographic change." And as were being diversified into a country definitely not Western via demographic warfare as we euphemize from sunrise to the sunset of our demise something is exactly the same as in my opening example: There are those amongst us aiding and abetting this invasion. We can start with the fact that Barack Obama and his fellow travelers have sparked this most recent human wave with promises of amnesty for young illegals. Obama has also hobbled immigration enforcement which itself is a euphemistic way of saying that he has like a fifth column cleared the way for an invading force. Adding insult to injury not only is there no effort at deportation but his administrations first response to the childrens crusade was to provide lawyers for the illegals paid for with your tax money to help make these reinforcements permanent. In fact Obama is so intent on aiding the invasion that he has served notice that if Congress wont be complicit in his scheme he will use an executive order to help the foreign boots on the ground. Question: what do you call such a person? Of course this is nothing new. We have had seven amnesties in recent decades and all the way through there were promises to secure the border. It never happened. Fool me once shame on you. And if they can fool you seven times? Youre a doormat. Theres only one thing foreign boots on the ground do to doormats mind you and it isnt to show respect and gratitude. Its obvious why leftists such as Obama have long facilitated immigration: they are importing voters. Upwards of 80 percent of the new arrivals will vote Democrat upon being naturalized. And is this any surprise? Most all illegals and a majority of legal immigrants hail from Hispanic nations which are notoriously socialist (only the degree varies). And people dont suddenly change ideology just because they change location. This brings us to Republicans who claim that Hispanics are a natural conservative constituency" and that all the GOP need do is offer the olive branch of amnesty. Theirs is an imagination that could put Gene Roddenberry to shame. While Hispanics do generally favor amnesty the main thing the majority of them want is what they voted for in their socialist homelands: big government. Dont believe me Karl? Just consider recent Pew research (hat tip: American Thinkers Thomas Lifson) showing that only 19 percent of Hispanics favor a smaller government while a whopping 75 percent prefer a bigger one. Of course assimilation is the answer right? Take a gander at the rest of the Pew data:  And what does this equate to once Hispanic majority status is reached (along with the leftward drift of non-Hispanic whites)?

• 19- 75 = government of Venezuela
• 36-58 = government of Mexico

In other words modern immigration = death of America. And to reiterate this doesnt mean just illegal migration. Ever since Ted Kennedys immigration act of 1965 85 percent of our legal immigrants have hailed from the Third World and Asia. So in terms of demographic and ideological change there is no difference between legal and illegal migration. Yet it isnt just Hispanic immigrants. One reason I favor a moratorium on all immigration is that we face a largely socialist world. Where would we find immigrants amenable to authentic Americanism? Europe? China? Africa? The Middle East? The only exception may be Russia but I wouldnt want to bet my culture on that either. While Ive framed this ideologically it can be defined culturally and racially (gasp!) too. And I wont shrink from this since it is exactly what the left is doing. Theres an old saying if you cant get the people to change the government change the people. Heres a simple fact: what we call traditional conservatism is a phenomenon of Christian European-descent people (modern Europeans no longer qualify because of their secularism). One can debate the reasons for this but it is plainly true. Its why almost 90 percent of GOP voters are white and almost 90 percent are Christian; its why church attendance is one of the best predictors of voting patterns. Mind you this doesnt mean that other groups wont contain some conservatives but the fact is that no other major group is majority conservative. Then there is that uncomfortable truth: Obama and many other leftists hate what they see as white America" Obama described white culture as alien" in his book Dreams from My Father and they want to destroy it as fast as possible. This is why while giving the 1998 commencement address at Oregons Portland State University Bill Clinton spoke glowingly of the day when whites become a minority in America (to the uproarious cheers of the mostly white students). Of course this is where Obama Clinton and the rest of the fifth column will say that if youre not cheering youre a bigot. Yawn. If the Joneses were somehow gaining access to the Smiths home squatting there and slowly taking over while the police refused to enforce trespassing laws no one would wonder if the Smiths objected. The fact that Joneses arent Smiths would be explanation enough. Or lets say that millions of Chinese were flooding the Ivory Coast were supplanting African culture and threatening to soon outnumber the Africans. Would we be surprised if the Ivorians were up in arms? Would anthropologists call the transformation anything but cultural genocide? Again though we call this diversity. But theres a funny thing about that oh-so necessary quality: Its only encouraged in Western lands. If diversity is such an imperative why dont we push it in Saudi Arabia Japan Tunisia or Rwanda? And dont tell me were just minding our own business as Obama thought nothing of parading around Africa last year preaching about homosexual rights. The truth is that when liberals say Our strength lies in our diversity" they really mean their strength. Theyre building a solid socialist majority that wont blink at leftist corruption because these new arrivals are inured to it corruption is status quo in their native lands. And what else can we say about these migrants? Most are just coming to the US to make money while some have criminal designs. But what is certain is that even if they were capable of shedding deep-seated socialist instincts theyre not coming here to become American in spirit. And theyre casting votes Americans wont cast. Back in 2009 a former Labour (Britains liberal party) speechwriter created a firestorm by revealing that the UK government had encouraged unfettered immigration to rub the Rights nose in diversity." This prompted The Telegraphs Ed West to call the leftists plan borderline treason." Borderline? I think thats another border that was brazenly crossed. And does this kind of behavior deserve any less damning a characterization on our side of the pond?