It is interesting to hear certain kinds of people insist that the citizen cannot fight the government. This would have been news to the men of Lexington and Concord as well as the Mujahideen in Afghanistan. The citizen most certainly can fight the government and usually wins when he tries. Organized national armies are useful primarily for fighting against other organized national armies. When they try to fight against the people they find themselves at a very serious disadvantage. If you will just look around at the state of the world today you will see that the guerrillero has the upper hand. Irregulars usually defeat regulars providing they have the will. Such fighting is horrible to contemplate but will continue to dominate brute strength."
When one discusses the real reason for the Second Amendment the right of citizens to defend themselves against a potentially tyrannical government inevitably someone points out the stark difference in firepower between a guerrilla uprising in the United States and the United States government itself.
This is not a trivial observation. The U.S. government spends
more on the military than the governments of China Russia Saudi Arabia India France United Kingdom and Japan combined. Plus the potential of a tyrannical government is arguably upon us with the federal government
spying on its own citizens militarizing local police departments with equipment and tactics from the War on Terror and
repeatedly searching Americans which desensitizes them to this invasive process.
There is much historical precedent however for guerrilla uprisings defeating more powerful enemies. For instance the Cold War saw both superpowers brought to their knees by rural farmers for the Soviets their adventure in Afghanistan against the Mujahideen and for the United States the Vietnam War against the Viet Cong.
In both cases nuclear weapons could have been used against the guerrilla uprising but were not. Even assuming the use of nuclear weapons from the position of total desperation its hard to imagine they would have made much of a difference in the final outcome of either conflict. Unlike the invading armies the local resistance enjoyed both broad-based support as well as knowledge of the local terrain.
Now imagine such a scenario in the United States. You wouldnt be the first person to do so. From
Red Dawn to
James Wesley Rawles Patriots series there is a relatively long-standing tradition of American survival literature about the
hoi polloi resisting the tyranny of big government either before or after a collapse.
For the purposes of this article consider what a domestic
American terrorist or freedom fighter (after all the label is in the eye of the beholder) organization based on the
militia movement would look like in open revolt against the United States government. In the spirit of levity well call them the Hillbilly Viet Cong." They would most likely find their largest numbers in Appalachia but dont discount their power in the
American Redoubt or the more sparsely populated areas of the American Southwest including rural Texas.
Here we have tens of thousands of Americans armed to the teeth with combat experience deep family ties to both the police and the military extensive knowledge of the local geography and in many cases survivalist training. Even where they are not trained militant and active they enjoy broad support among those who own a lot of guns and grow a lot of food.
On the other side you have the unwieldy Baby Huey of the rump U.S. governments military with some snarky BuzzFeed editorials serving as propaganda.
Could the Hillbilly Viet Cong take down the USG? Maybe maybe not. But its difficult to imagine that the USG could take
them down.
Indeed even with a number of nasty little toys on the side of the federal government we live in an age of a technologically leveled playing field. This is true even when it comes to instruments of warfare. While the USG has nuclear weapons its worth remembering that a pound of C4 strapped to a cheap and readily available commercial-grade drone is going to break a lot of dishes.
This sort of guerrilla insurgency has a name: Its called fourth-generational warfare (4GW) and you might be surprised to learn that you already live in this world.
Continue reading
Asymmetrical Warfare and 4GW: How Militia Groups are Americas Domestic Viet Cong at
Ammo.com.
