The U.S. is Racist for not Paying for Every Child in the World

afrcnchldrnRegardless of how you feel about fixing the border conflict, exploiting the lives of children as pawns is nothing more than a radical leftist Saul Alinsky tactic, to push through an agenda that our representative democracy has rejected. Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, the playbook of Obama, Hillary Clinton and other liberal Democrats in power today, taught the left how to undermine the successful, brilliant, longstanding representative democracy this country was founded on, in order to accomplish their unpopular, unfair and historically discredited radical agenda.

Alinsky advocated using arguments that sound “moral” to trick people emotionally. Who could be against poor children? Is dumping illegal immigrant children in various states around the country instead of deporting them – separating them from their parents – moral? No, it is really despicable, since it exploits the children in order to shove through a radical open borders agenda.

Their so-called “compassion” is selective. Why not rescue all the poor children in the world and invite them to the U.S.? Of the 2.2 billion children worldwide, almost half, or 1 billion, live in poverty. The population of the U.S. is a little over 300 million, so there is no way the U.S. could possibly afford to take in and pay for all those children.

Read the rest of the article at Townhall

Print Friendly

Add Comment Register



Leave a Reply








Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



IC Contributors