The NY Times has Spoken: There must be Global Warming… Are you Kidding Me! Let’s send Fishberg a Message!

If you can’t show the evidence we must assume that the scientific hypothesis of global warming and the new one for the last decade is bogus and unfounded.


As most of you may know the NY Times graced us with an unbiased editorial about global warming.  It was even signed by 4 past GOP EPA leaders.  The debate must be over!

 

Like most of you I have a very liberal brother-in-law through marriage and he teaches global warming to his students. Complete with a PDF file.

 

I also received an email from Ivan Fishberg. (email: info@barackobama.com) If you agree… Please send this article to your congress and also email Ivan and tell him to stop making fun of the climate change deniers in your congress and tell him to work on the failing Obama economy  and not this unfounded propaganda.  To think that man in a godless society could control the climate is somewhat god-like and unsupported by any science.

 

First off all these guys are liberal and non-scientist bureaucrats that signed the NY Times editorial on August 2 2013.

And we should commend their underlings of the EPA for cleaning up the rivers and streams. But they still can’t seem to get DuPont to clean up their mess. And they don’t seem to have the authority in the Asian developing countries to stop polluting the air and water and the earth.

Do you really believe that if we send them our money they will stop! 

 

Whitman was a joke. She said that it was ok for the 911 workers not to wear masks. Then she testified that she didn’t say that. She had the power to order them to wear masks or close down the site.  Not really a problem… taxpayer will  pay for all illness caused by 911.

 

Actually I did see this NYT’s article and saved it.  I dismissed it as an editorial in the NY Times. I wonder which liberal wrote the article?

 

There is no longer any credible scientific debate about the basic facts: our

world continues to warm, with the last decade the hottest in modern records,

and the deep ocean warming faster than the earth’s atmosphere. Sea level is

rising. Arctic Sea ice is melting years faster than projected.”

 

That is not true. If it is not warming in the Eastern US, then why would we believe it has warmed anywhere. Again warming is a bad way to go. Anyone that thinks man can cause the earth to warm is pretty gullible.

And once the earth cools like now, you have a problem.  They also limit the warming to the last decade. Pretty small window for such a large problem!!!! Leno had a joke. It was a hot day in LA and he said he couldn’t tell if it was global warming or July!

 

By the way… Agenda 21 is not a conspiracy.  The bureaucrats are acting on its premise. They send your money to other countries. Your liberal congress passed cap and trade. It is not a conspiracy. They are acting on it. It is just that it is about power and money and not the environment.  California that prosperous state has passed cap and trade. Where will they send the money? Do you know there are markets to bet on the cost of the CO2 being traded globally? Great way to make billions!

 

Last part of the Times statement supports storm water issues. Warm water is flowing into the ocean and heating the ocean. But when they write deep ocean warming… do you think the thermometer may be near a volcano.  And what previous temps are they comparing it to. These are scary statements. Anybody who does not question these statements are lemmings or college professors of liberal universities or bureaucrats.

 

Again show us the data and prove the hypothesis. To say the debate is over should raise the hair on the back of your neck. Assuming the neck was supported by a backbone.

 

“The costs of inaction are undeniable. The lines of scientific evidence grow

only stronger and more numerous. And the window of time remaining to act is growing smaller: delay could mean that warming becomes “locked in.”

 

If a salesman said this to me… I would walk away. That’s a new hypothesis. Locked in. The argument for storm water could be locked in, But we can always build reservoirs to catch a percentage of that warm, desalinating water from reaching the seas and use that water to replenish drought areas and aquifers. Let’s see the BS lines of scientific evidence that supports these bogus statements.

 

“A market-based approach, like a carbon tax, would be the best path to

reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, but that is unachievable in the current

political gridlock in Washington. Dealing with this political reality,

President Obama’s June climate action plan lays out achievable actions that

would deliver real progress. He will use his executive powers to require

reductions in the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by the nation’s power

plants and spur increased investment in clean energy technology, which is

inarguably the path we must follow to ensure a strong economy along with a

livable climate.”

 

If you believe this crap then we know how Hitler took over the lemmings of Germany.  This was not written by the authors. By the way check out the World Resources Institute.  Who wrote this garbage… All about power and money. Tell me how taxing somebody in Peekskill NY is going to convince China and all the other Asians from polluting the environment? Also check out the financial backers for this institute. Let me know if Soros is involved in any way? Why would anyone with money support this institute… to make more money. More money leads to more lobbysts and more political contributions.

 

In the most gentlest and kindest way possible if you believe this stuff presented in this fashion you are an idiot. And folks who support this nonsense should be removed from office.

 

If they stuck with real pollution there would be support. But then there is the argument at what level. The new EPA wants to lower the Ozone level. For what scientific reason… because they can.  Don’t you wonder why the oil spill in the Gulf just dissipated away. Funny when you have a liberal president. All that oil was swallowed up by the … fishes????

 

Let me tell you about the EPA. As a protected college professor, you don’t have to deal with these folks. But the EPA in York PA if they could would have all lead paint removed from the outside of the buildings. Next they will want all the HG fillings removed from the mouth.

So tell me again how we went from children allegedly eating lead paint chips in the home to lead paint on the outside of the building? Children are grazing on the outside of buildings these days!  Bring back those couch potatoes!

 

Please quit guessing. You were a scientist once. Why don’t you become one again and prove that this is all garbage. And it is not a conspiracy. This is happening right now.

 

Go to that institute website and I betcha you will find the same type of verbiage at the site.

 

When the liberals you elected passed cap and trade, at the following G summit meeting the foreign  loons were protesting where is our money.

We have not heard much about global cap and trade again. Some stupid people might not mind being taxed and sending money to the “poor” bureaucrats in our country like Jesse Jackson Jr. But to send it to the global community you have to be nuts.  And if you think it will have a result… can lemmings fly?

We sent them our jobs, now we want to continue to send them our money!!!!

 

There is no scientific data to support this nonsense. Since the last 365 days have been the coolest in over a decade, then we know that President George Bush fixed the problem. The amount of CO2 has been reduced under President Bush. I don’t know how you measure it and who is measuring it, but since the earth is cooling which had nothing to do with man, the problem is solved. Your hypothesis is in the toilet.

If it was up to me I would not give another country a penny. Let’s fix our own problems before you liberals want to fix the world problems.

Let’s see Obama go up to China and Putin and tell them to stop polluting.

 

But the door is still open. The challenge is made. Prove it. Show us scientific facts and evidence. Don’t show us propaganda to give money and power to folks that do not deserve it! If this was Nixon behind this propaganda you would be all over it. I asked for scientific data and you send liberal propaganda.

 

Have more respect for what you believe in. Don’t insult us. Show the evidence.

If you can’t show the evidence we must assume that the scientific hypothesis of global warming and the new one for the last decade is bogus and unfounded.

Therefore there is no global warming and man has not caused it. I can show you record temps (high and low) that are older then a decade.

End of debate.

 

Our country is run by Lobbyists. Maybe it is time that our country be run by the people (citizens). By the way many of these lobbyist represent foreigners and their countries. I wonder if they support global cap and trade?

 

Wake up America before we get locked in!

Print Friendly

1 comment to The NY Times has Spoken: There must be Global Warming… Are you Kidding Me! Let’s send Fishberg a Message!

  • Anonymous

    The global warming alarmists argue that the overwhelming majority of scientists agree that man made global warming is taking place. Number 1 there are plenty of scientists who don’t agree and number two the climate models of those scientists predicted rapid heating during the last 10 years that didn’t take place. If the models don’t work than why should be believe those scientists know what they’re talking about? In addition every climate scientist in the U.S. knows that if they want a grant they’d better say man made global warming exists.
    Scaring people about global warming is a great way for the Obama administration to take away money from Republican supporting companies and give them to his supporters.

Add Comment Register



Leave a Reply






Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner






IC Contributors