Rachel Alexander is one of the most outspoken conservatives today. She started Intellectual Conservative in 2002, then progressed to writing for websites like Townhall, The Christian Post and Right Wing News. Even left-wing sites like the UK Guardian reached out to her and offered her paid writing gigs. She is now a senior editor and writer with The Stream.
In 2005, she was offered a job in Arizona as a deputy county attorney and adviser to newly elected Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, a conservative activist. She accepted the position, and continued to expand her writing and websites, starting IC Arizona, a subsidiary of her main website, where she would post press releases from Thomas.
She wrote many groundbreaking articles while working for Thomas, including one for Fox News that explained why the prosecutor’s office was attempting to prosecute someone for child pornography (she has a background in tech), and another article exposing the unfair, race-based DUI courts that the Arizona Superior Court in Maricopa County had set up.
She was awarded the Right Online (Americans for Prosperity) activist of the year award in 2009 for her efforts. From 2011-2015, Right Wing News has ranked her among the top 50 conservative columnists in the country.
But ironically, at the same time, for her courageousness in exposing left-wing abuses, she began to be viciously targeted in 2009 by the left, from both the Arizona State Bar and the left-leaning Arizona judiciary. Conservative commentator Michelle Malkin has written the most comprehensive summary of what happened to Rachel here.
It is astounding in so many ways, where to start to explain it all? Rachel’s former boss, Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, along with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, attempted to prosecute corrupt county supervisors and complicit judges (the supervisors controlled the judges’ budgets so they were untouchable – oops!), for things like spending campaign money on thousands upon thousands of dollars on luxury personal items. Rachel had a very minor role in it all; her name was briefly put on a racketeering (RICO) complaint AFTER it had been filed, and almost none of her research was included on anything that was filed. She was briefly assigned to only that one complaint, as a lesser attorney, supervised under the “RICO” expert in the office. The complaint was withdrawn two and half months later, so nothing ever happened. But based on this, powerful left-wing attorneys connected to the county supervisors and judges who control the State Bar came after her too along with her boss and one of his senior prosecutors. Notably, they did not come after her immediate supervisor, the apolitical RICO expert who had a much larger role in the RICO complaint, drafting and finalizing some of the pleadings, unlike her.
At one point, the Bar prosecutors demanded to know everything she had ever written online — including anonymously — in the last five years, a gross violation of free speech. Halfway through the bar trial against her – which was livestreamed for over two months for everyone to see, at a cost of over $500,000 for everything including bringing in pricey attorneys from out of state – the Bar’s attorneys realized how weak their case was against her, and offered her settlements. At first, they offered her two years probation. She refused, based on principle, since she hadn’t done anything wrong. Then, they offered her one year of probation. She refused again. Finally, when the trial was almost over, and they realized how ridiculous their case was, they offered her a settlement of just taking a few extra continuing legal education courses. Again, she refused based on principle – she had done nothing wrong. Many people would have caved at this point. Not Rachel. She is sticking it out to the bitter end, in order to make sure this kind of abuse can’t happen to others, and will do what she can to make it happen, which includes converting the Bar to a voluntary association, as it is in about half the states. She is working on bills in the Arizona legislature to accomplish this.
With a complicit State Bar disciplinary judge, who was reportedly put in the position since he would do the bidding of the State Bar – who has his own history of corruption – they disbarred Rachel’s former boss, one of his lead prosecutors, and suspended Rachel from practicing law for six months.
The corrupt Maricopa County Supervisors quit paying for her defense, and so she was forced to appeal her suspension to the Arizona Supreme Court pro se, spending hours researching and writing a 30+ page appeal herself. She was able to get her sentence reduced slightly in the appeal, but not by much. She would have appealed again to the U.S. Supreme Court, but by then had come down with several health problems related to stress, including a hernia and gallbladder surgery. She was supposed to be automatically readmitted after six months, but the Arizona State Bar continues to do everything it can to keep her from being readmitted. They will not readmit her unless she pays $101,500 for prosecuting her AND her boss and his chief prosecutor! This is no joke. She is being held liable for the actions of her superiors!
It has now been two and a half years, and this corrupt cabal continues to do everything it can to keep Rachel from clearing her name and getting her license reinstated. It has cost her over $7,000 and counting for out of pocket expenses to attorneys to try and fight it.
This is unheard of in the case of a deputy county prosecutor – even a former risk management chief for the county has privately admitted that it’s unheard of for a deputy county attorney not to get their bar disciplinary costs reimbursed. Rachel is suing the county supervisors to recover this cost – she fortunately found an attorney who is so incensed by the injustice that he is representing her on contingency fee, requiring costs only – but the supervisors are spending taxpayer dollars galore to fight back, and the Bar has unlimited resources, having just increased membership dues for attorneys, no doubt as a result of this expensive disciplinary case and show trial. The expensive Bar prosecutor they brought in from out of state reputedly has ties to the Mafia and doesn’t even have a law degree. The story is that he was put in that position in order to protect powerful homebuilder and real estate interests in Colorado and Arizona, and since Thomas tried to prosecute county supervisor Stapley’s former business partner Wolfswinkel, a convicted felon….
In contrast, her former supervisor, who was not targeted by the Bar, finally had the Bar conduct disciplinary proceedings against him when the Bar realized it would have egg on its face for not going after him too. He entered into a settlement agreement, admitting to have willfully committed ethical violations, and was only sentenced to probation, allowed to continue working at his job with the county. Amazingly, the county picked up the entire tab for his prosecution! Rachel was never found to have “willfully” done anything unethical, yet the county will not pay for the cost of prosecuting her. Rachel counted 13 times he lied – perjury – during the trial against her.
Rachel believes she was also targeted by a powerful left-wing attorney who sits on the Bar’s Board of Governors and was Bar president at the time the complaint started against her, Ed Novak. The article she wrote for Fox News destroyed work he had done defending a young man accused of downloading nine images of child porn. In her article, Alexander explained how there was no way a virus could have downloaded the child porn, then burned it to a CD that was sitting on his shelf. The young man’s family hired a PR firm to put up a website defending him and attacking Andrew Thomas, and made an appearance on the TV show 20/20 to further attack Thomas. Five years later, the young man’s father filed a lengthy bar complaint against Rachel over the article, that was very well-written going over all the ethical rules. Rachel believes Novak ghostwrote it for him — can’t stop tormenting her years later.
What happened to Rachel could happen to any of us.Rachel supported her husband’s four teenagers (no child support) for much of the past six years, and the stress finally destroyed her marriage. She has over $65,000 in student loans she cannot make payments on currently. She had been making payments of $700/mth on her student loans and would have paid them all off by 2013 if this hadn’t destroyed her finances, reputation and ability to make a living. She lost her home to foreclosure in 2012. We will keep this page updated with news of Rachel’s fight to get her bar license back, other articles she writes about conservatives targeted through the legal system, and her lawsuits.
Read more about Rachel’s case