Mark Levin’s Game Changer: Pulling the Emergency Cord To Stop the Runaway Federal Freight Train

The conservative proponents of Article V now, indeed partly out of deep respect for Phyllis Schlafly, who opposes a constitutional convention, offer iron-clad safeguards against her concern about the possibility of a “runaway convention.”

Two Marks, Levin and Meckler, notably and nobly are proposing to change the rules of modern politics and governance.

Debuting at Amazon Number One (for all, not merely political, books) is syndicated radio talk show host Mark Levin’s The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic.  Sporting an average of 4.7 stars from, at the time of this writing, 153 reviews on Amazon, Levin calls for a populist suite of Constitutional amendments to be initiated by the States.

Levin proposes to reform the federal government from its degenerate, bloated, imperial structure back to its (small r) republican roots. Even more interesting than his specific proposals is the mechanism.

There is a little-known “emergency cord” built into the Constitution by the Founders.  Find it in Article V.  It allows for the States, rather than just the Congress, to propose Constitutional amendments. It is obscure yet entirely legitimate — and invaluable.  It was extolled by James Madison in The Federalist No. 43.

Meanwhile, on August 15th, on the ground and the Web, a civic “Seal Team Six” — of operatives and activists — has constituted itself as  (This columnist has there enlisted as a foot soldier.) Its purpose?  “COS seeks to call a Convention of States for a particular subject—limiting the jurisdiction and power of the federal government. This strategy would allow the states to formally consider almost all of Mark Levin’s ‘Liberty Amendments,’ giving delegates the freedom to propose the necessary amendments to stop the runaway power of Washington, D.C.”

COS’s president is Mark Meckler, head of Citizens for Self-Governance. Meckler co-founded and co-coordinated the Tea Party Patriots, the largest and most authentic Tea Party mega-group.  He departed thence “to work more broadly on expanding the self-governance movement beyond the partisan divide.”  Head of Citizens for Self-Governance’s Convention of the States Project is the powerful and principled Michael Farris, Chancellor of Patrick Henry College and Chairman of the Home School Legal Defense Association.  They are joined by Mark Wohlschlegel II, Executive Director, Laura Fennig, Coalitions Director and Jordan Sillars, Communications Director.

While recruits and mobilizes political commandos Levin takes to the printing press and to the airwaves — with important support from such megaphonic forces as Rush Limbaugh.  Limbaugh, generously lauding Levin’s efforts, recently had this to say on his show:

“Have you heard of Mark Levin’s new book, The Liberty Amendments?  … It’s fascinating.  Everybody still asks me, “Rush what can I do, besides vote?”  Everybody wants to do something.  Well, look, the standard, ordinary give-and-take and back-and-forth of politics isn’t gonna work anymore.  There are remedies for this.  …  The American people are going to have to fix this, and that’s what Levin’s book is about.  It’s a wonderful book.

“I don’t want to say it’s simple, but it makes so much sense.  … And it is something that, the more people read it, the more people become familiar with it and demand that something be done to reaffirm and strengthen the Constitution, it’s something like this that is going to be necessary … The American people have the power to change this …”

Indeed we do.

Levin’s book is the first mass-emergence of something that Meckler and others — including, among others, the Goldwater Institute’s Constitutional expert Nick Dranias and the Independence Institute’s Constitutional scholar Robert G. Natelson — have been working on for some time.

As this columnist wrote here in 2011 Meckler was one of the two lead figures in a seminal gathering held at Harvard University at the initiative of the great (albeit decidedly social democratic) humanitarian populist legal sage Prof. Lawrence Lessig.

As then stated:

“Last week the unthinkable happened.  While you were distracted by the banal and only marginally important presidential primaries, the lion, Harvard Law School, publicly lay down with the lamb, the Tea Party Patriots.  The long-term political implications are, potentially, far more potent than a mere presidency.”

The essence of this epochal event was just (but no less than) this:

“Lessig and the Tea Party, and its guiding spirits, are populists.  Populism was forever redefined by Jeffrey Bell ([then] a business partner of this columnist) as optimism about people’s ability to manage their own affairs better than an elite can manage them for them.  Populism is neither left nor right wing.  Populists of all stripes share in common a conviction in ‘power to the people,’ a belief that in a republic ‘citizen’ is the noblest office.  And while Lessig and Meckler may disagree about just about every ideological issue, their respect for the wisdom and dignity of the citizens unites them in a realm far more important than the ideological.

They came together to explore a mechanism by which America’s government can be changed by, of, and for the people.  Jefferson was unequivocally right when he wrote:

‘Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.’

So.  Are there insufferable evils?

For the first time in modern history the populist left and populist right came together to endorse, and seek a way to operationalize, a transcendent belief in citizens over government.”

Are there insufferable evils today?  You bet there are.  Is Article V a valid means of redress?  Yes.

Yet there are figures on the right who oppose a states-driven constitutional amendment process.  Foremost among these has been the great Phyllis Schlafly. The conservative proponents of Article V now, indeed partly out of deep respect for her, offer iron-clad safeguards against her concern about the possibility of a “runaway convention.”

The support by such deservedly respected bodies as the Goldwater Institute and the American Legislative Exchange Council have allayed the fears of all but the “’til the last dog dies” skeptics.  Among these skeptics include some lions of the left as well. Consider Harvard’s Prof. Laurence Tribe under the quilts with the John Birch Society in opposition. Together they make perhaps the strangest-bedfellow tableau in constitutional history since Hamilton and Jefferson served together in Washington’s cabinet.

We, the people, have, of late, sent waves of reformers to Washington to restore to us our power, money and dignity.  We see our champions (mostly) stymied by the System.  Therefore… it is time to change the System.  Amending the Constitution represents a classical liberal, conservative, not radical, solution.

As James Madison wrote  in The Federalist No. 43,

“That useful alterations will be suggested by experience, could not but be foreseen. It was requisite, therefore, that a mode for introducing them should be provided. The mode preferred by the convention seems to be stamped with every mark of propriety. It guards equally against that extreme facility, which would render the Constitution too mutable; and that extreme difficulty, which might perpetuate its discovered faults. It, moreover, equally enables the general and the State governments to originate the amendment of errors, as they may be pointed out by the experience on one side, or on the other.”  (Emphasis added.)

Time to use the U.S. Constitution’s Article V to restore the precedence of the people over the government.  Time to use Article V to restore America’s Constitutional rights to their native classical liberal, fierce, status.

It’s been an unequal fight.  Our government has much too much power and money. We, the people, demand our money, our power, and our dignity back.


We mere citizens cannot, it seems, win the game as now constituted. Article V, the game changer, is a path back to liberty. Bravo, now, to the two Marks, Levin and Meckler.  Time to pull the Constitution’s emergency cord to stop the runaway federal freight train.

Print Friendly

3 comments to Mark Levin’s Game Changer: Pulling the Emergency Cord To Stop the Runaway Federal Freight Train

  • As a lawyer, who is a self declared non-expert on the constitution, I’m just waiting for the states to try this while Eric Holder declares it out of order and Obama says that in his self-proclaimed expertise that the states have no authority to do any such thing.

    We live in interesting times.

  • Anonymous

    Liberty and Tyranny and Epistemic Closure
    By Jim Manzi
    April 21, 2010 2:40 PM

    I started to read Mark Levin’s massive bestseller Liberty and Tyranny a number of months ago…it seemed to all but ignore the most obvious counter-arguments that could be raised to any of its assertions. This sounds to me like a pretty good plain English meaning of epistemic closure.

    I’m not expert on many topics the book addresses, so I flipped to its treatment of a subject that I’ve spent some time studying — global warming…It was awful. It was so bad that it was like the proverbial clock that chimes 13 times — not only is it obviously wrong, but it is so wrong that it leads you to question every other piece of information it has ever provided.

    It reads like a bunch of pasted-together quotes and stories based on some quick Google searches by somebody who knows very little about the topic, and can’t be bothered to learn.

    That is, Levin’s argument from authority is empty.

    Or does he believe that the whole thing is a con in which thousands of scientists have colluded across decades and continents to fool such gullible naifs as the U.S. Congressional Budget Office, numerous White House science advisors, Margaret Thatcher, and so on? Are the Queen of England and the Trilateral Commission in on it too?

    But what evidence does Levin present for any of this amazing incompetence or conspiracy beyond that already cited? None. He simply moves on to criticisms of proposed solutions. This is wingnuttery.

    But if you’re someone who read this book in order to help you form an honest opinion about global warming, then you were suckered. Liberty and Tyranny does not present a reasoned overview of the global warming debate; it doesn’t even present a reasoned argument for a specific point of view, other than that of willful ignorance.

  • Bill Walker

    There are many problems with the Levin book none of which have to do with his proposed amendments. To describe all would entail too much for this posting.

    So I’ll give two: First he fails to mention the current status of applications before Congress. Second, he fails to mention the number of applications from the states. Instead he makes people believe this is a “beginning” an entirely false statement.

    You can read the truth at where you can read the 746 applications from 49 states already on file with Congress.

Leave a Reply

The politically motivated, wrongful prosecution of Rick Renzi

Rick Renzi Puts Together Top Legal Team to Appeal Hidden Evidence of FBI Agent's Corruption

Judge Unbelievably Refuses to Grant a Retrial for Former Rep. Renzi Despite Finding Rampant Prosecutorial Wrongdoing

Bombshell: New Evidence Reveals Prosecutor Corruption in Trial Against Former Congressman Rick Renzi

Time For a Congressional Investigation: Shattering New Developments of Corruption in Rep. Renzi Trial

Judge Unravels Illegal Activity by Prosecution That Ensured a Conviction of Renzi — But Will he do Anything About it?

Former Congressman Renzi Deserves a New Trial

SCOTUS Turns Down Former Rep. Rick Renzi’s Appeal of Legal Assault

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

IC Contributors