We are the only site on the web devoted exclusively to intellectual conservatism. We find the most intriguing information and bring it together on one page for you.
Home
Articles
Headlines
Links we recommend
Feedback
Link to us
Free email update
About us
What's New & Interesting
Mailing Lists
Intellectual Icons
Submissions
A Conscientious Objector to the Gender War
by
Wendy McElroy, ifeminists.com
17 June 2003
This is the key to understanding
the cult of victimhood surrounding PC feminism: as long as "male institutions"
remain, women are -- by definition and everywhere -- oppressed. In their
worldview, the only way to cease being victims is for feminists to grab the
helm.
Future
feminists will look back in disbelief at today's false notion of a built-in
Gender War between men and women, in much the same way we regard past theories
of a flat Earth.
Only flat-Earthers were generally harmless people. Politically correct feminists can be vicious.
To understand the Gender War, it is necessary to examine each word separately.
What Is Gender?
Politically correct feminists consider "sex" to be a matter of biology; that
is, you are physically male or female. By contrast, they believe "gender"
is a social construct; that is, your sexuality is defined by society, not
biology. By this definition of gender, there are currently about 20 different
categories of gender, from heterosexual to lesbian, from transvestite to
transgendered.
"Socially constructed" means that everything about your sexuality -- short
of the brute biology -- can be transformed by changing your environment.
PC feminists claim that everything from the urge to procreate to male-female
attraction is created by society. This is different from merely claiming
that your environment influences you.
Transforming the environment, therefore, is a political matter. PC feminists
contend that the institutions of society -- such as the legal system, churches
and the family -- must be deconstructed and rebuilt according to "correct"
principles.
What Is the War About?
The current principles are said to be incorrect and anti-woman because men,
acting as a class, constructed them. Men define "woman" by her biology --
for example, as a sex partner or mother -- and they force a male definition
of gender upon her through their institutions.
In short, PC feminists see the Gender War as a tugging contest between two
classes, men and women, for control of "woman." The political interest of
men is called "patriarchy," or white male culture. The political interest
of women is PC or gender feminism.
However, many assumptions of the Gender War are absurdly false, beginning
with the rejection of biology's crucial role in human nature. Perhaps the
most destructive assumption is that men and women are separate and antagonistic
political classes.
There can be valid reasons for dividing women and men into separate classes.
For example, doctors often medically separate the sexes to apply different
treatments. Women are examined for breast cancer; men for prostrate problems.
But medicine does not claim that the basic health interests of men and women
as human beings are separate and in conflict. Indeed, the interests of both
do not widely diverge. Because of a common biology, the sexes share the same
basic approach to nutrition, exercise and common sense lifestyle choices.
Health for men and women is roughly defined and pursued in the same manner.
By contrast, politically correct feminism separates men and women into political
classes and claims that their common humanity is less important than their
genders. Accordingly, men and women not only have no shared political interests
-- their interests directly conflict.
Consider freedom of speech. You might assume that all human beings benefit
from the uninhibited flow of words and ideas, even offensive ones. But that
would be a "male" assumption, coming from male institutions. Freedom of speech
is simply a guise by which men "control the dialogue" to oppress women. Thus,
PC feminists often dismiss the U.S. Constitution -- including the First Amendment
-- as a document written by dead white men and of no importance.
To counter male control of the dialogue, such feminists seek to suppress
politically incorrect words and ideas. In the workplace, laws such as those
against verbal sexual harassment control words. In academia, ideas are regulated
by language codes which categorize criticism or "attacks" on categories of
human beings -- other than white males -- as hate speech. Even children's
textbooks are edited to remove politically incorrect references.
To PC feminists, such censorship is not a violation of freedom of speech.
In essence, they claim there is no such freedom; there is only social control
through social construction. The real question is: Whose hands will be on
the helm? Men's or women's?
This is the key to understanding the cult of victimhood surrounding PC feminism.
As long as "male institutions" remain, women are -- by definition and everywhere
-- oppressed. In their worldview, the only way to cease being victims is
for feminists to grab the helm.
Whenever feminists do grab the helm, men cry out: We have become second-class
citizens! We are legally disadvantaged in the workplace by affirmative action,
ignored as victims of domestic violence in the home, discriminated against
in funding for health care, oppressed by family courts that favor a mother's
claim to custody ... the list scrolls on.
But protesting men miss the point. Until the "utopian" day when the institutions
of society have been reconstructed, gender feminists claim no equality is
possible. It is men against us; men win only if women lose, and vice versa.
That's the class conflict known as the Gender War.
The only way out of the quagmire is to abandon convoluted social theory and
return to common sense. Men and women are first and foremost human beings.
Biology is a controlling factor of human nature, albeit not the only one.
Men and women act as individuals, not as cogs in some vast class struggle.
And, as individuals, we all share the same political interest: freedom.
Wendy McElroy is the editor of ifeminists.com and a research
fellow for The Independent Institute in Oakland, Calif. She is the author
and editor of many books and articles, including the new book, Liberty for
Women: Freedom and Feminism in the 21st Century (Ivan R. Dee/Independent
Institute, 2002). She lives with her husband in Canada. Reprinted with permission of ifeminists.com.